-- replying in-line to --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 14:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids & OOoLight Status
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
wrote:
> +1,
>
> Nice thinking, Guy.
>
> Perhaps a bit more work and resource to make this customizable, and a
> great idea. This also matters for enterprise deployments and such. That,
> along with customized template sets can be very important in certain areas
> of application.
>
> We still have the original resource problem to solve, yet it is nice to
> see thoughtful definition taking place.
Do we (AOO) have to solve that, or is it the project (being downstream to
AOO) ?
To me it sounds like a downstream adaptation.
<orcmid>
I confess I was thinking of customizations as something that could be
added without having to rebuild the code. That would require
building-in of a technique for customization. The starter and
intermediates might well be introduced in that manner, though part
of the default build.
I suppose that means creation of an extension point unless it is
practical to skin the product using the existing extension machinery.
I also suppose that there has to be versioning of an extension point
and concerns for future distributions breaking existing customizations.
</orcmid>
rgds
jan i
[ ... ]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
