Am 02.12.2017 um 14:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 02.12.2017 um 14:39 schrieb Marcus:
Am 02.12.2017 um 13:22 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Despite of the name it could be the icon of the dmg file? I don't
know where this icon set is visible... ;-)
Apart from that: +1 for a public beta.
But we should build "real" beta builds, with the appropriate
naming/graphics:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Beta/About%20OpenOffice%20Beta%204.2.0.png
oh yes, good hint. IMHO the splash screen and start center graphic
should show clearly that this is a beta release. Plus different
filenames for the installation files.
That is all handled by building for target "openofficebeta"
(sdkoobeta/ooobetalanguagepack).
oha, the last beta is bloody long ago that I've forgotten that this
build target already exists. ;-)
Marcus
Am 01.12.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
My latest 4.2.0-dev builds are available at
http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.2.0-dev-r1816768/
<http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.2.0-dev-r1816768/>
But these are dmg's not installers.
On Dec 1, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Matthias
Seidel<matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
Hi Jim,
Did you have the opportunity to install 4.2.0 on macOS?
I would be interested if the new icon does show up:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/setup_native/source/mac/ooo3_installer.icns
I created it on Windows with a program called "iConvertIcons" and
had no
chance to test it.
Regards, Matthias
Am 01.12.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
I like it. I already have Linux, Windows and macOS 4.2.0-dev
builds available
(http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
<http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>) for some langs
On Nov 30, 2017, at 5:15 PM, Marcus<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
Am 30.11.2017 um 21:26 schrieb Dave Fisher:
In light of our current situation with getting builds together
but not having a lot of people doing more than simple QA what
does the team think about releasing a Public Beta for 4.2.0? I
think that this would be an advantage for the project and might
serve to bring in more of the community as QA volunteers.
I thought it's without discussion that we need a (long) beta test
phase for 4.2.0. So, yes for your proposal.
We can create a new entry on the download webpage, some
advertising areas on the other webpages, and other fine things to
make it visible.
And - also this should be clear already - we need several builds
of 4.2.0 with further included bugfixes; to show an increasing
quality towards the final release build.
For me the real question is " *When* do we start the beta? ". ;-)
I would like to have a specific level of quality that we give to
our users. Otherwise we will get spammed by bug reports which
nobody wants to handle.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
