On 1/9/2021 6:20 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi Keith, > > On 1/9/21 4:40 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> On 1/9/2021 12:16 PM, Dennis Hamilton wrote: >>> I think it is clear, from a continuing doc@oo.a.o thread, that there >>> is no cheese to be found developing derivative AOO documentation from >>> the original OpenOffice.org 3.2 documentation that was produced >>> outside of OpenOffice.org itself. >>> >>> I wonder if a more vibrant and experienced avenue might be found by >>> consulting the Apache OpenOffice Community Forum, >>> <https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/>. >>> >>> - Dennis >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net> >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 14:58 >>> To: d...@openoffice.apache.org >>> Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort >>> >>> [orcmid] [ ... ] >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> Actually Dennis that may not be true. According to the the Legal FAQ >> site https://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#GPL the Gnu >> Public License version 3 is compatible with ALv2. >> >> Regards >> Keith > > I might be wrong but I'm reading that statement as ALv2 is compatible > with GPL v3 not the other way around. > It is a statement quoted from the FSF site. > > Best regards, > Carl
Carl; I was a bit confused myself when I first read it, but why post it on an ASF FAQ site if it doesn't grant reciprocity? Regards Keith
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
