Hi Marcus, Pedro, All, Am 22.04.22 um 00:07 schrieb Marcus: > Am 21.04.22 um 19:59 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> FYI there are 6 binding votes >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.12#AOO4.1.12-VoteResolution >> > > right, for voting we don't need more time as we have enough. We need > at least 3 +1 votes but we have already 7 votes (6 of them are binding). > > So, do you see any need or additional benefit for more testing (except > that more in general is of course always good ;-) )? > > No criticism, just asking.
Just my 2 cents: Personally, I would like to see *much* more people download and test at least the binaries. And yes, that is also true for members of the PMC. ;-) Regards, Matthias > > Thanks > > Marcus > > > >>> On 04/21/2022 3:02 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'll keep this open for a few more days to allow for more testing >>> and voting... >>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2022, at 1:36 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 13 Apr, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>>> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary >>>>> community builds of >>>>> Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA. >>>>> >>>>> These artifacts can be found at: >>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.12-RC1/ >>>>> >>>>> Please cast your vote: >>>>> >>>> The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: >>>> >>>> [X] yes / +1 >>>> >>>> [ ] no / -1 >>>> >>>> My vote is based on >>>> >>>> [ ] binding (member of PMC) >>>> >>>> [X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [FreeBSD] >>>> >>>> [ ] I have tested the binary RC on platform [ ] >>>> >>>> I tested the source tarball checksum. >>>> >>>> Opening, editing, saving existing calc and writer docs works. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature