Hi all,
Someone just informed me off-list that this email could be taken the wrong way. I'd like to clarify that what I mean to say is "let's not dwell on this". Personally, I don't think that a fork would be successful, but what I was trying to say is that we shouldn't make our lives difficult by dwelling about what RMS might have in mind. Just let him do whatever. This doesn't have to be a big deal if we don't make it one.
I hope that's better. I apologize if I conveyed the wrong message.
Best, Daniel.
Daniel Carrera wrote:
vy.ho wrote:
Should they fork JBoss because it runs on none-free Java too?
If they want to spend their time forking JBoss, I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. Let them be.
If they want a none-free Java, create one, not OOo. And don't steal Sun's property. Create one, not asking Sun to give it out free.
Forking is not theft. What RMS wants to do something that is permitted by OOo's license, and which has been done at least 3 times already.
Cheers, Daniel.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
