-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
vy.ho wrote:
> Daniel Carrera wrote:
>
> >
> >If they want to spend their time forking JBoss, I'm not going to lose
> >any sleep over it. Let them be.
> >
> JBoss is just an example of their argument. Forking is fine with me too
> on open source stuff. However, the reason behind it ("because it runs
> on Java") does not sound right to me.
This is not the argument here. The argument here is the *non-freeness*
of it. It still needs a non-free JRE to run important stuff....
> equivalent of theft, I think). I also didn't mean to go offtopic here,
> but the guy mention the whole reason behind this thing is a none-free
> Java. So, there's more than 1 way to skin a cat. You can fork OOo to
> make it not depend on Java, or you can write an implementation of Java,
> or just accept it. Was it a problem in the first place?
See my other reply.
Regards,
Rene
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCf9kE+FmQsCSK63MRAnhmAJ4s/gi5nOCIsdztAvP8uJT7Y1fldgCfWBHt
vQm1rcw6Fn81fSvs2/lJwQQ=
=Iqmz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
