Ross Johnson wrote:
I know there have been a (very) few adverse comments in the user lists about the previous icons,
Well then ... Let me be amongst the 1st to complain :)
The current ( 2.0.1 ) icons make OOo look like a pre- Windows 95 application. I have had *many* complaints from users - some of them attacking the appearance directly, and others attacking it in a roundabout kind of way ( vague suggestions that it's dodgy 10-year old abandoned freeware spring to memory ). I am sure that if there were a *decent* icon set, it would change the way a large number of people view OOo. I haven't seen the new icons, but I find it hard to believe they are a step backwards.
Having said that, I understand the issues you raise re: the documentation project ... and also the point on changing the look & feel in a minor version release.
Anyway, I was under the impression that someone was working on adding support for switching the icon-set at runtime. Or was I mistaken?
-- Daniel Kasak IT Developer NUS Consulting Group Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060 T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 9922 7989 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] website: http://www.nusconsulting.com.au --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
