Ross Johnson wrote: > Some of this may be better put in an issue report, but ... > > This is not such a petty thing - all the icons seem to have changed from > what they were in v2.0.1. Is this simply an aesthetic change, or was > there a serious problem with the previous icons? Just wondering why it's > worth confusing users at a micro version change - usually these thing > change only at major version increments.
It was a big request of the developer community to integrate new features more often, preferrably in the next possible release. Reading your comment it seems you can't please everybody. <sigh> > It also affects work on the > documentation projects. Luckily the OOo2 user guide hasn't quite got as > far as updating images yet - but it's very close - I believe GRS want's > to link the icon images, but then there are the screenshot images to > cope with. > > It may be a matter of getting used to them, but I thought the previous > icons more clearly conveyed what they represent. People wanted the "new" icons because they are more like the ones they have on their desktop. I agree that the previous one are better and IIRC you can still use them. Choice is good. :-) > Also, the Help - About window still shows OOo 2.0. This is a current > issue because users are finding it difficult to describe which version > they're using on the users lists. They're generally told to press an > obscure key combination to display the build version and credits. This > slows communication down quite a bit while the users list goes through > an unnecessary REQUEST/PLEASE CONFIRM/UPDATED REQUEST/ANSWER cycle. This has been fixed for OOo2.0.2. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
