Hi Bernd, On Wednesday, 2007-11-14 18:02:29 +0100, Bernd Eilers wrote:
>> This can even be automated (sic!), since for the feature mail, you need >> to specify a project, anyway, which means the mail goes to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Adding some additional "feedback to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" should be easily possible, /me thinks. As a side note: users@ lists are irregularly read by developers, and for some projects like framework a [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't even exist and wouldn't make much sense either. Better would be some [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. > I bet you want to have the Reply-To: Mail header also set accordingly and > not just the sentence added at the end of the text than, don't you ;-) ? > > Doing this users hitting the reply button on mail received via the > allfeatures list will than automatically reply to the right list. Bear in mind that CollabNet does Reply-To munging (yes, still considered harmful) so you would end up with two different Reply-To headers where it depends on order and the mail client which one would actually be used. Nothing reliable. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. SunSign 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
pgpNssai3Vqg0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
