Hi Eike, >>> This can even be automated (sic!), since for the feature mail, you need >>> to specify a project, anyway, which means the mail goes to >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Adding some additional "feedback to >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" should be easily possible, /me thinks.
> Just adding that mentally to a > nice-to-have-and-probably-quickly-implementable-feature-wishes-for-eis-list > in my head. Nice, thanks. > As a side note: users@ lists are irregularly read by developers, and for > some projects like framework a [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't even exist and > wouldn't make much sense either. Better would be some > [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. Hmm - which means Bernd has to move it to the nice-to-have-not-exactly-quickly-to-implement-feature-wishes-for-eis list. For ease of implementation in EIS, the feedback list should probably be the same in all projects. Introducing yet another dedicated feedback list in every list doesn't sound like a good idea. I don't know for other projects, in DBA, both users@ and dev@ are low-traffic and read equally. Perhaps [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be the choice then. It would contradict my understanding of "dev", since it's really a user discussing the feature ... Another possibility: we use a global [EMAIL PROTECTED] (either [EMAIL PROTECTED], or a new dedicated feedback list). At least the UX member of the iTeam will read this, and can delegate to the appropriate list. >> I bet you want to have the Reply-To: Mail header also set accordingly and >> not just the sentence added at the end of the text than, don't you ;-) ? >> >> Doing this users hitting the reply button on mail received via the >> allfeatures list will than automatically reply to the right list. > > Bear in mind that CollabNet does Reply-To munging (yes, still considered > harmful) so you would end up with two different Reply-To headers where > it depends on order and the mail client which one would actually be > used. Nothing reliable. They really add a second header? I always though they simply overwrite an existing one, but this is even worse ... :( However, looking at some recent feature mails in DBA, it seems somebody already sets a "reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" - not sure whether this is EIS, or collab.net. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
