Grant Slater wrote: > Politely, hell no. > > Compare total hardware usage and cost of operating and coordinating > ti...@home* layer versus mapnik layer. Mapnik layer still operates > from 1 server!
hey, so does t...@h. It operates from 1 server. Just uses a few more clients :). > * t...@h got us here, but mapnik can carry up further. It would be > excellent to see the performance APIs which grew from t...@h growing more > useful, maybe towards a feature set like xapi? I would love to see more ROMAs and TRAPIs put in place (fast read only mirror), also XAPIs that allow convenient filtering might be nice) What about the search server. Is that hardware sufficient? Indexing and searching is quite crucial and I seem to recall that the index was only updated every few months due to perf reasons. spaetz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
