Hey,

Still there at least for the moment lol
Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain but
we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could
start the release today and have binaries for vote today.

Thanks a lot
Jean Louis
Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it needs
> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt misunderstand).
> This is clearly blocking ATM :(.
> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> > Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today.  But I
> > also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue :)  I
> > suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :)
> >
> > If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him to
> get
> > the release started.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Ok lemme at least try this morning.
> > >
> > > Jean-Louis
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> > >
> > >> We should fix the session destroy issue first.
> > >> Should be really easy.
> > >> Anyone likes to take over?
> > >> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit short
> > this
> > >> week...
> > >>
> > >> LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>
> > >>> To: [email protected]
> > >>> Cc:
> > >>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24
> > >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1?
> > >>>
> > >>> Lol
> > >>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some
> fixes
> > >> but
> > >>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so.
> > >>>
> > >>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <[email protected]>
> > >>> a écrit :
> > >>>
> > >>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -David
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to