If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix. You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases.
If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my main purpose. JLouis 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > sure, go on. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected] > >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41 > >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > > > > >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait for a > >release or always for a bug to fix. > >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even if > we > >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able to > >release more than once a year. > > > >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not fully > >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to fix/do. > > > >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork as we > >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets out. > > > >Any thoughts/objections? > > > >JLouis > > > > > > > >2013/11/6 David Blevins <[email protected]> > > > >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note. Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the > >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from > their > >> product unless they get a release. They've been asking since July. > Seems > >> there cutoff is Friday. > >> > >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two > >> releases. One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA > >> 2.3.0 is released. Then there's no need to rush. > >> > >> > >> -David > >> > >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression > >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps > which > >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently > >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. > >> > > >> > > >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX. > >> > > >> > LieGrue, > >> > strub > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >> >> To: [email protected] > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49 > >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Hey, > >> >> > >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol > >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain > >> but > >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we > could > >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks a lot > >> >> Jean Louis > >> >> > >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> a > >> écrit : > >> >> > >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but > it > >> needs > >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt > >> misunderstand). > >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(. > >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a > >> écrit : > >> >>> > >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today. > But > >> I > >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue > >> :) I > >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for > him to > >> >>> get > >> >>>> the release started. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> -David > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > [email protected]> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Hi, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Jean-Louis > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first. > >> >>>>>> Should be really easy. > >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over? > >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit > >> short > >> >>>> this > >> >>>>>> week... > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> LieGrue, > >> >>>>>> strub > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >> >>>>>>> Cc: > >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24 > >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Lol > >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some > >> >>> fixes > >> >>>>>> but > >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> > >> >>>>>>> a écrit : > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release? > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> -David > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> -- > >> >>>>> Jean-Louis > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >Jean-Louis > > > > > -- Jean-Louis
