testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: > If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix. > You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases. > > If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my main > purpose. > > JLouis > > > 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> sure, go on. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >________________________________ >> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >> >To: [email protected] >> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41 >> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >> > >> > >> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait for a >> >release or always for a bug to fix. >> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even if >> we >> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able to >> >release more than once a year. >> > >> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not fully >> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to fix/do. >> > >> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork as we >> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets out. >> > >> >Any thoughts/objections? >> > >> >JLouis >> > >> > >> > >> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <[email protected]> >> > >> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note. Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the >> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from >> their >> >> product unless they get a release. They've been asking since July. >> Seems >> >> there cutoff is Friday. >> >> >> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two >> >> releases. One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA >> >> 2.3.0 is released. Then there's no need to rush. >> >> >> >> >> >> -David >> >> >> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression >> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps >> which >> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently >> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX. >> >> > >> >> > LieGrue, >> >> > strub >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >> >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49 >> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hey, >> >> >> >> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol >> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain >> >> but >> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we >> could >> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot >> >> >> Jean Louis >> >> >> >> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> a >> >> écrit : >> >> >> >> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but >> it >> >> needs >> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt >> >> misunderstand). >> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(. >> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a >> >> écrit : >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today. >> But >> >> I >> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue >> >> :) I >> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for >> him to >> >> >>> get >> >> >>>> the release started. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -David >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < >> [email protected]> >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>> Hi, >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first. >> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy. >> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over? >> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit >> >> short >> >> >>>> this >> >> >>>>>> week... >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> LieGrue, >> >> >>>>>> strub >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >> >> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> >> >>>>>>> Cc: >> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24 >> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Lol >> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some >> >> >>> fixes >> >> >>>>>> but >> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so. >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> >> >> >>>>>>> a écrit : >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release? >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> -David >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> -- >> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> >Jean-Louis >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Jean-Louis
