...so you accept to not follow the spec and breaks apps? I dont! I dont know for openjpa but owb is clearly blocking...1.5.2 is unusable, i dont want another dead release Le 6 nov. 2013 21:42, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait for a > release or always for a bug to fix. > We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even if we > identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able to > release more than once a year. > > So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not fully > fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to fix/do. > > For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork as we > did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets out. > > Any thoughts/objections? > > JLouis > > > 2013/11/6 David Blevins <[email protected]> > > > On the OPENJPA-2335 note. Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys on the > > users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from their > > product unless they get a release. They've been asking since July. > Seems > > there cutoff is Friday. > > > > Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do two > > releases. One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and OpenJPA > > 2.3.0 is released. Then there's no need to rush. > > > > > > -David > > > > On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a regression > > which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old apps > which > > run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test (currently > > failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. > > > > > > > > > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ________________________________ > > >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49 > > >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > >> > > >> > > >> Hey, > > >> > > >> Still there at least for the moment lol > > >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with Romain > > but > > >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we could > > >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today. > > >> > > >> Thanks a lot > > >> Jean Louis > > >> > > >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > >> > > >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch but it > > needs > > >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt > > misunderstand). > > >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(. > > >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > >>> > > >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release today. > But > > I > > >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days overdue > > :) I > > >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :) > > >>>> > > >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for him > to > > >>> get > > >>>> the release started. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -David > > >>>> > > >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > [email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first. > > >>>>>> Should be really easy. > > >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over? > > >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a bit > > short > > >>>> this > > >>>>>> week... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> LieGrue, > > >>>>>> strub > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > > >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> Cc: > > >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24 > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Lol > > >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting some > > >>> fixes > > >>>>>> but > > >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or so. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> a écrit : > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -David > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis >
