Hey guys, Trying to prepare the release. Was cleaning up JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is not set. Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for" field to XXX. Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really resolved? Then, I can finish the README from the release notes. Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long nor hard. Thanks for your help. Jean-Louis 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > *tested > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I > > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: > >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix. > >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases. > >> > >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my > main > >> purpose. > >> > >> JLouis > >> > >> > >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> > >>> sure, go on. > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >________________________________ > >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >>> >To: [email protected] > >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41 > >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait > for a > >>> >release or always for a bug to fix. > >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even > if > >>> we > >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able > to > >>> >release more than once a year. > >>> > > >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not > fully > >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to > fix/do. > >>> > > >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork > as we > >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets > out. > >>> > > >>> >Any thoughts/objections? > >>> > > >>> >JLouis > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <[email protected]> > >>> > > >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note. Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys > on the > >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from > >>> their > >>> >> product unless they get a release. They've been asking since July. > >>> Seems > >>> >> there cutoff is Friday. > >>> >> > >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do > two > >>> >> releases. One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and > OpenJPA > >>> >> 2.3.0 is released. Then there's no need to rush. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -David > >>> >> > >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a > regression > >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old > apps > >>> which > >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test > (currently > >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > LieGrue, > >>> >> > strub > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> ________________________________ > >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >>> >> >> To: [email protected] > >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49 > >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Hey, > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol > >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with > Romain > >>> >> but > >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we > >>> could > >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Thanks a lot > >>> >> >> Jean Louis > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" < > [email protected]> a > >>> >> écrit : > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch > but > >>> it > >>> >> needs > >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt > >>> >> misunderstand). > >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(. > >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> > a > >>> >> écrit : > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release > today. > >>> But > >>> >> I > >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days > overdue > >>> >> :) I > >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :) > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for > >>> him to > >>> >> >>> get > >>> >> >>>> the release started. > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> -David > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > >>> [email protected]> > >>> >> >>>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>>> Hi, > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning. > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first. > >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy. > >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over? > >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a > bit > >>> >> short > >>> >> >>>> this > >>> >> >>>>>> week... > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue, > >>> >> >>>>>> strub > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >>> >> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc: > >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24 > >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > >>> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol > >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting > some > >>> >> >>> fixes > >>> >> >>>>>> but > >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or > so. > >>> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" < > [email protected]> > >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit : > >>> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release? > >>> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David > >>> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> -- > >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >-- > >>> >Jean-Louis > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis > -- Jean-Louis
