Docker in Docker has some slight security improvements depending on your use case, too, compared to just mounting your docker socket into the running container.
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 10:30, Tyson Norris <tnor...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > > I suspect that due to Docker-in-Docker scenario, it will be easier to use > java+jar (+local docker) instead of running the jar in a container. > > Today you can start the jar with only java <jar>, but you will need a bunch > of parameters (probably different per OS?) to run it in a container, I think. > Local docker client is switched per OS here > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/231e739373ef681c44b5647a6956d5838a87db2e/core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/docker/StandaloneDockerContainerFactory.scala#L37 > I guess this wouldn't apply if running in a container, but it arguably makes > running the jar simpler than running the container IMHO. > I also suspect you won't get the behavior of launching playground ui to > browser either, which I would miss. > > Tyson > > On 11/9/19, 5:38 AM, "Michele Sciabarra" <mich...@sciabarra.com> wrote: > > Wow. I missed those evolutions. So I guess it should not be hard to > package it as a docker image. > > To be able to say to people: execute "docker run -p 8080:8080 > openwhisk/standalone" and enjoy... > > If it is possible I can volounteer to write the dockerfile do that... > > I have a question: does it use the local docker? Where is the invoker? > > > -- > Michele Sciabarra > mich...@sciabarra.com > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > Subject: Re: OpenWhisk as a single docker image? > Date: Saturday, November 09, 2019 2:31 PM > > Do you mean the standalone controller? > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fopenwhisk%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fcore%2Fstandalone%2FREADME.md&data=02%7C01%7Ctnorris%40adobe.com%7Cfc313c39337a44a5882a08d7651a0cbc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637089034867332217&sdata=OCnWo8R5OfbKLaSQCEeI%2B7pqz0ewp%2BYQGBK2msMoMtc%3D&reserved=0 > > -r > > > On Nov 9, 2019, at 8:18 AM, Michele Sciabarra <mich...@sciabarra.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I remember the discussion about the openwhisk as a single executable > that includes also Kafka. So I wonder: is it now possible to run (for > development purposes of course) OpenWhisk as single docker image if we add > also couchdb to that one? Because I have an use case where even a > docker-compose can be inconvenient... > > > > -- > > Michele Sciabarra > > mich...@sciabarra.com > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
