+1 to chandler/utils/
--- Bear http://code-bear.com
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF) http://www.osafoundation.org
PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111 D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29
On Apr 26, 2005, at 1:02 PM, Morgen Sagen wrote:
Yep, I agree with Heikki that tools should be for scripts outside of chandler, and something like "util" should be for helper modules. So tools/timing.py (if it's still useful) would be moved to util/timing.py.
On Apr 26, 2005, at 9:57 AM, Heikki Toivonen wrote:
I would vote against tools in this case. IMO tools is something that is
not needed by Chandler itself when it is running, but some external
scripts (maybe tweak repo outside of Chandler or something).
Unfortunately we already have chandler/tools folder that contains stuff
required to run Chandler itself - I'd vote to move that elsewhere once
we decide where that should be.
I think Alec's examples would rather go into chandler/util(s), or chandler/lib(s) or something like that - neither of which we have yet.
Mike Taylor wrote:In the past python only code like that has been placed in chandler/tools/
On Apr 26, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Alec Flett wrote:
So I've been poking around with the Python Cookbook and found a few
recipes that are vastly simplifying my code... (namely
CachedAttribute and frange, which does floating-point xrange-style
ranges) and I have a few of my own (CopyOnWrite, etc)
-- Heikki Toivonen
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
