+1
--- Bear http://code-bear.com
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF) http://www.osafoundation.org
PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111 D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29
On Apr 26, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
So, it sounds like we have a process proposal for chandler.
To be clear, here's my understanding of how this could work for us:
(+) If you want to make a change that requires some coordination and consensus, call a vote.
(+) You (the person who calls the vote) will be responsible for making the change, unless you can get someone to volunteer to help you out.
(+) Specify a time frame for the vote, or wait 1 business day.
(+) Silence implies consent.
(+) If you are calling for a vote, change the subject line (add [VOTE]) to clue people in.
(+) If you disagree with the proposal (-1), you are obligated to offer an alternative or otherwise helpful suggestion.
For major design and architectural decisions, we'd still expect a spec and more of a review process. We wouldn't use this mechanism to set osaf priorities (0.6 feature priorities, for example).
So here I am calling for a vote. ;)
Cheers, Katie
Alec Flett wrote:Ted Leung wrote:+1
In an Apache style project, the person who calls a vote is usually the one who implements.
I think this is a general open source philosophy - if you whine about it, you fix it.If people start voting, then someone (such as Morgen, in this case) volunteers to implement once the vote has concluded.+1Votes usually run long enough for people in every timezone to reply. In the Apache case, this can be as long as 72 hours, although on important votes, people usually specify a date by which voting will conclude.+1
(and chandler/util is fine with me)
Alec
---------------------------------------------------------------------- --
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
