I agree it's not the desired behavior, but if people feel like the
resulting "longer" start-up time is a worse usability problem, then
it might be worth doing.
Can other iCal users talk about whether they've noticed this bug and
if you have, how much of a problem is it for you? Would a slightly
faster start-up time be worth losing item selection across sessions
in the short-term?
Mimi
On Nov 10, 2005, at 4:47 PM, John Anderson wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised the iCal developers would consider this a
bug. Since the way their application is written, it probably
requires a bunch of extra work to remember state and I wouldn't be
surprised if they just haven't gotten around to doing that work.
Anyway having the application look like you left it is usually
considered the correct behavior.
John
Mimi Yin wrote:
we could deselect the item, iCal does that.
On Nov 10, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Morgen Sagen wrote:
I just thought I'd point out that assuming the user has an item
in the detail view when they quit Chandler, that item will be in
the detail view when they next run Chandler, so the 3 second
delay will be a problem on most subsequent startups. Or does
this delay only happen with the Welcome Note for some reason?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
