Hi Vakhtang, hi Thomas, signing a PDF seems to be one of the top use cases for PDFBox. Maybe you can outline what has to be done to a ‚core‘ of PDFBox i.e. what might be missing from a PDF perspective and what is part of a signing application. Having a reference implementation for signing using PDFbox would be very good. And as modularization is one of the themes of PDFBox 2 we could organize it accordingly.
BR Maruan Am 09.01.2014 um 12:30 schrieb Thomas Chojecki <[email protected]>: > Am 2014-01-09 11:45, schrieb Vakhtang koroghlishvili: >> Hello, > Hi Vakhtang, > >> I can implement this feature :) >> 2) After I implement TSA time feature, which I have written above, I think >> It will be very good if we implement (I can implement this too) PADES LTV >> profile. In the other words, it is PAdES-Long Term Validation Profile. See >> specification doc: >> http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102700_102799/10277804/01.01.01_60/ts_10277804v010101p.pdf > > This would be great. Maybe we can someday create a new subproject signbox or > something else that will be shipped within the pdfbox project. So custom > solution isn't needed. > > Since middle of december I'm sitting without internet and waiting for the > provider. So I can only doing mail support this time. > >> I think they are very important and usefull features. :) > Of course. This would be an important step to improving the signature > functionality. The last ETSI Plugtest (interop test) shows, that there are > some companies using pdfbox for his signature solution. Maybe a general base > would help to be more interoperable to other libraries. > >> So, what do you think about this features? :) > Great idea. And thanks for investing so much time to improve the signature > base. > > Best regards > Thomas
