Bump this mail for Vakhtang. :)
Am 2014-01-09 12:43, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
Hi Vakhtang, hi Thomas,
signing a PDF seems to be one of the top use cases for PDFBox. Maybe
you can outline what has to be done to a ‚core‘ of PDFBox i.e. what
might be missing from a PDF perspective and what is part of a signing
application. Having a reference implementation for signing using
PDFbox would be very good. And as modularization is one of the themes
of PDFBox 2 we could organize it accordingly.
BR
Maruan
Am 09.01.2014 um 12:30 schrieb Thomas Chojecki <[email protected]>:
Am 2014-01-09 11:45, schrieb Vakhtang koroghlishvili:
Hello,
Hi Vakhtang,
I can implement this feature :)
2) After I implement TSA time feature, which I have written above, I
think
It will be very good if we implement (I can implement this too) PADES
LTV
profile. In the other words, it is PAdES-Long Term Validation
Profile. See
specification doc:
http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102700_102799/10277804/01.01.01_60/ts_10277804v010101p.pdf
This would be great. Maybe we can someday create a new subproject
signbox or something else that will be shipped within the pdfbox
project. So custom solution isn't needed.
Since middle of december I'm sitting without internet and waiting for
the provider. So I can only doing mail support this time.
I think they are very important and usefull features. :)
Of course. This would be an important step to improving the signature
functionality. The last ETSI Plugtest (interop test) shows, that there
are some companies using pdfbox for his signature solution. Maybe a
general base would help to be more interoperable to other libraries.
So, what do you think about this features? :)
Great idea. And thanks for investing so much time to improve the
signature base.
Best regards
Thomas
