That would be good. +1 for `release-1.0` 何品
PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> 于2023年7月4日周二 17:32写道： > Hi everyone, > > After we get the Pekko core repo released (along with the 1.0.0 jars), > we need to introduce branches. > > We need to be able to create patch releases and to open up development > for a future 1.1.0 release. > > I propose that we create a 'release-1.0' branch before we allow > forward development to commence on the main branch. > > With PRs, I suggest that they target the main branch first. If we > think that they should be applied to the 'release-1.0' branch too, > that should be discussed on the dev mailing list. > > We should reintroduce the binary compatibility checks to monitor for > any breaking changes relative to the 1.0.0 release. With the > 'release-1.0' branch, we would probably want to ensure that we avoid > binary incompatible changes unless they are absolutely needed. > > Even with the v1.1.0 focused changes, I think we need to come up with > an agreement about how far we want to go. I would suggest that we try > to minimise binary incompatible changes. If there is a shortcoming in > any existing API function and we need to change its inputs or return > type then we should probably deprecate the existing version of the > function and introduce a new function. > > Feel free to add your own opinions to this thread. > > Regards, > PJ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org > >
