I don't have a strong opinion on branching and names!   I tend to avoid
using the term "release" in a branch name since branches, by definition,
are in movement and a release is a static event.  But it's common enough in
ASF projects -- Flink distinguishes between branches `release-1.X` and tags
`release-1.X.Y` and it's never been a source of confusion.

With my release manager hat on: It's much easier to keep on top of commits
when they are backported or cherry-picked at the same time they're merged
to main.  Doing it as a future step (just before a minor release) is
tedious and error prone!  How many major + minor releases do you think the
community can maintain simultaneously?

All my best, Ryan





On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 11:32 AM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> After we get the Pekko core repo released (along with the 1.0.0 jars),
> we need to introduce branches.
>
> We need to be able to create patch releases and to open up development
> for a future 1.1.0 release.
>
> I propose that we create a 'release-1.0' branch before we allow
> forward development to commence on the main branch.
>
> With PRs, I suggest that they target the main branch first. If we
> think that they should be applied to the 'release-1.0' branch too,
> that should be discussed on the dev mailing list.
>
> We should reintroduce the binary compatibility checks to monitor for
> any breaking changes relative to the 1.0.0 release. With the
> 'release-1.0' branch, we would probably want to ensure that we avoid
> binary incompatible changes unless they are absolutely needed.
>
> Even with the v1.1.0 focused changes, I think we need to come up with
> an agreement about how far we want to go. I would suggest that we try
> to minimise binary incompatible changes. If there is a shortcoming in
> any existing API function and we need to change its inputs or return
> type then we should probably deprecate the existing version of the
> function and introduce a new function.
>
> Feel free to add your own opinions to this thread.
>
> Regards,
> PJ
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to