[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326868#comment-14326868
]
Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-1675:
---------------------------------------
+1 to the idea of using DirectExecutorService.
Are you suggesting that we have a separate thread pool for getting HTable in
MutationState? If we use DirectExecutorService, getting an HTable will be using
the request thread itself. By request thread I mean the thread which called
commit(). So it shouldn't be that bad. Even if we use a thread pool, the parent
request thread would still need to wait for a thread in the pool to return the
HTable. What do you think? [~jamestaylor]
> Improve Phoenix client threading
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-1675
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1675
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Attachments: PHOENIX-1675_wip.patch
>
>
> See PHOENIX-971 for some interesting threading discussions. Moving here for
> further discussion.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
