Devs,

Thanks folks for picking up the JIRAs and fixing most of them in the list
quickly.

PHOENIX-628 & PHOENIX-1710 are in progress. James any idea how much time
they will take to commit?
I can wait for one more day to complete the work.

Still no work started at below JIRAs and since they are improvements I
think we can move them to next version.
- PHOENIX-1673
- PHOENIX-1727
- PHOENIX-1819

Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:57 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Devs,
>
> I have created branches  4.4-HBase-1.0 and 4.4-HBase-1.1  from master to
> work with 1.0.x and 1.1.x respectively.
> If any changes further should be committed to the branches as well. Please
> don't miss.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajeshbabu.
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Sergey Belousov <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I am interested in it (kind of show stopper for us) but I am totally
>> swamp.
>> at work at home... just one of thouse periods.
>>
>> hopefully will have some brake next month or earlier.
>>
>> sorry
>> On Apr 22, 2015 4:38 PM, "[email protected]" <
>> [email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks all for pointing and working on the JIRA.
>> > Some of them already committed. Thanks Eli, Samarth Jain,Cody Marcel for
>> > quick turn around.
>> >
>> > @Samarth
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1819
>> > When we can expect the patch for this?
>> >
>> > If we are not able to complete the list by tomorrow then I can take RC
>> > around next Tuesday.
>> > By the mean time I will create branches for 1.0.x and 1.1(If it's ok) as
>> > well and see the health of it(do some testing).
>> > What do you say?
>> >
>> > I think no progress for PHOENIX-1673. Any one want to take it?
>> > @Sergey Belousov are you interested in it?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Rajeshbabu.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Sergey Belousov <
>> > [email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > would be  nice if
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1673
>> > > makes to 4.4
>> > >  On Apr 22, 2015 11:42 AM, "Cody Marcel" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I have sort of combined PHOENIX-1728
>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1728> and
>> PHOENIX-1729
>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1729>. I hopefully
>> will
>> > > > have
>> > > > a pull request today for those. PHOENIX-1727
>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1727> will likely
>> be a
>> > > bit
>> > > > before I can work on. Work internally, particularly support for
>> mixed
>> > r/w
>> > > > workloads (not sure if there is a Jira yet) seems to be higher
>> > priority.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:32 PM, James Taylor <
>> [email protected]>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Another couple that need to go into 4.4.0 release IMO are
>> > PHOENIX-1728
>> > > > > (Pherf - Make tests use mini cluster so that unit test run at
>> build
>> > > > > time) and PHOENIX-1727 (Pherf - Port shell scripts to python).
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > James
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, James Taylor <
>> > [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > You're welcome (and Samarth did the work). Thanks,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >     James
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 AM, [email protected]
>> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > >> That's really great work James. Thanks for pointing.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:47 AM, James Taylor <
>> > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>> Good list, Rajeshbabu. Thanks for starting the RC process. One
>> > more
>> > > > of
>> > > > > >>> note that's already in:
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> - 7.5x performance improvement for non aggregate, unordered
>> > queries
>> > > > > >>> (PHOENIX-1779).
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > > > >>> James
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, [email protected]
>> > > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> > That's good to have Eli. I have marked 4.4.0 as fix version
>> for
>> > > the
>> > > > > JIRA.
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>> > Thanks,
>> > > > > >>> > Rajeshbabu.
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Eli Levine <
>> > [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>> >> Rajesh, I'm harboring hopes of getting PHOENIX-900
>> completed
>> > by
>> > > > > >>> Thursday.
>> > > > > >>> >> Hopefully it'll end up in 4.4. I'll keep you posted.
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >> Thanks
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >> Eli
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:42 PM, [email protected] <
>> > > > > >>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >> > I'd like to propose we can have 4.4.0 RC on Thursday.
>> > > > > >>> >> > We have got a lot of great stuff in 4.4.0 already:
>> > > > > >>> >> > - 60 bug fixed(which includes fixes from 4.3.1)
>> > > > > >>> >> > - Spart integration
>> > > > > >>> >> > - Query server
>> > > > > >>> >> > - Union All support
>> > > > > >>> >> > - Pherf - load tester measures throughput
>> > > > > >>> >> > - Many math and date/time buit-in functions
>> > > > > >>> >> > - MR job to populate indexes
>> > > > > >>> >> > - Support for 1.0.x (create new 4.4.0 branch for this)
>> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > > > > >>> >> > - PHOENIX-538 Support UDFs JIRA is very close.
>> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > > > > >>> >> > Is there any others that we should try to get in?
>> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > > > > >>> >> > Thanks,
>> > > > > >>> >> > Rajeshbabu.
>> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to