On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > Any chance of our hurrying up this process and shipping a Phoenix that > works on hbase 1.x? >
Would be great to have a Phoenix working on HBase 1.x for HBaseCon :) On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks James for confirming. Fine Ram we can include it. > > > > Thanks, > > Rajeshbabu. > > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Vasudevan, Ramkrishna S < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > By chance saw this mail. If we are ok with PHOENIX-1856 we can take > that > > > also. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: James Taylor [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 8:28 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Thinking of RC on Thursday > > > > > > Thanks, Rajeshbabu. I think all of those JIRAs can be pushed to the > next > > > release. The only one that's a must fix is PHOENIX-1930. Thomas is > > looking > > > at it now and should be able to give you a time estimate tomorrow for > it. > > > Thanks, > > > James > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:37 PM, [email protected] < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Devs, > > > > > > > > Thanks folks for picking up the JIRAs and fixing most of them in the > > > > list quickly. > > > > > > > > PHOENIX-628 & PHOENIX-1710 are in progress. James any idea how much > > > > time they will take to commit? > > > > I can wait for one more day to complete the work. > > > > > > > > Still no work started at below JIRAs and since they are improvements > I > > > > think we can move them to next version. > > > > - PHOENIX-1673 > > > > - PHOENIX-1727 > > > > - PHOENIX-1819 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rajeshbabu. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:57 AM, [email protected] < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Devs, > > > >> > > > >> I have created branches 4.4-HBase-1.0 and 4.4-HBase-1.1 from > master > > > >> to work with 1.0.x and 1.1.x respectively. > > > >> If any changes further should be committed to the branches as well. > > > >> Please don't miss. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Rajeshbabu. > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Sergey Belousov < > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I am interested in it (kind of show stopper for us) but I am > totally > > > >>> swamp. > > > >>> at work at home... just one of thouse periods. > > > >>> > > > >>> hopefully will have some brake next month or earlier. > > > >>> > > > >>> sorry > > > >>> On Apr 22, 2015 4:38 PM, "[email protected]" < > > > >>> [email protected]> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > Thanks all for pointing and working on the JIRA. > > > >>> > Some of them already committed. Thanks Eli, Samarth Jain,Cody > > > >>> > Marcel for quick turn around. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > @Samarth > > > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1819 > > > >>> > When we can expect the patch for this? > > > >>> > > > > >>> > If we are not able to complete the list by tomorrow then I can > > > >>> > take RC around next Tuesday. > > > >>> > By the mean time I will create branches for 1.0.x and 1.1(If it's > > > >>> > ok) as well and see the health of it(do some testing). > > > >>> > What do you say? > > > >>> > > > > >>> > I think no progress for PHOENIX-1673. Any one want to take it? > > > >>> > @Sergey Belousov are you interested in it? > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Thanks, > > > >>> > Rajeshbabu. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Sergey Belousov < > > > >>> > [email protected]> > > > >>> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > would be nice if > > > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1673 > > > >>> > > makes to 4.4 > > > >>> > > On Apr 22, 2015 11:42 AM, "Cody Marcel" > > > >>> > > <[email protected]> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > I have sort of combined PHOENIX-1728 > > > >>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1728> and > > > >>> PHOENIX-1729 > > > >>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1729>. I > > > >>> > > > hopefully > > > >>> will > > > >>> > > > have > > > >>> > > > a pull request today for those. PHOENIX-1727 > > > >>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1727> will > > > >>> > > > likely > > > >>> be a > > > >>> > > bit > > > >>> > > > before I can work on. Work internally, particularly support > > > >>> > > > for > > > >>> mixed > > > >>> > r/w > > > >>> > > > workloads (not sure if there is a Jira yet) seems to be > higher > > > >>> > priority. > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:32 PM, James Taylor < > > > >>> [email protected]> > > > >>> > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Another couple that need to go into 4.4.0 release IMO are > > > >>> > PHOENIX-1728 > > > >>> > > > > (Pherf - Make tests use mini cluster so that unit test run > > > >>> > > > > at > > > >>> build > > > >>> > > > > time) and PHOENIX-1727 (Pherf - Port shell scripts to > > python). > > > >>> > > > > Thanks, > > > >>> > > > > James > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, James Taylor < > > > >>> > [email protected] > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > You're welcome (and Samarth did the work). Thanks, > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > James > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 AM, [email protected] > > > >>> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >> That's really great work James. Thanks for pointing. > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:47 AM, James Taylor < > > > >>> > > > [email protected]> > > > >>> > > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >>> Good list, Rajeshbabu. Thanks for starting the RC > > > >>> > > > > >>> process. One > > > >>> > more > > > >>> > > > of > > > >>> > > > > >>> note that's already in: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > >>> - 7.5x performance improvement for non aggregate, > > > >>> > > > > >>> unordered > > > >>> > queries > > > >>> > > > > >>> (PHOENIX-1779). > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> > > > > >>> James > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, [email protected] > > > >>> > > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > That's good to have Eli. I have marked 4.4.0 as fix > > > >>> > > > > >>> > version > > > >>> for > > > >>> > > the > > > >>> > > > > JIRA. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Thanks, > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Rajeshbabu. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Eli Levine < > > > >>> > [email protected] > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> Rajesh, I'm harboring hopes of getting PHOENIX-900 > > > >>> completed > > > >>> > by > > > >>> > > > > >>> Thursday. > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> Hopefully it'll end up in 4.4. I'll keep you posted. > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> Thanks > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> Eli > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:42 PM, > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> [email protected] < [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > I'd like to propose we can have 4.4.0 RC on > > Thursday. > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > We have got a lot of great stuff in 4.4.0 already: > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - 60 bug fixed(which includes fixes from 4.3.1) > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Spart integration > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Query server > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Union All support > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Pherf - load tester measures throughput > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Many math and date/time buit-in functions > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - MR job to populate indexes > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Support for 1.0.x (create new 4.4.0 branch for > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > this) > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - PHOENIX-538 Support UDFs JIRA is very close. > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > Is there any others that we should try to get in? > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > Thanks, > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > Rajeshbabu. > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
