Rajeshbabu,

I commited a patch that should fix PHOENIX-1930.

Thanks,
Thomas


On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> Any chance of our hurrying up this process and shipping a Phoenix that
> works on hbase 1.x?
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, [email protected] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks James for confirming. Fine Ram we can include it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rajeshbabu.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Vasudevan, Ramkrishna S <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > By chance saw this mail.  If we are ok with PHOENIX-1856 we can take that
>> > also.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: James Taylor [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 8:28 AM
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: Re: Thinking of RC on Thursday
>> >
>> > Thanks, Rajeshbabu. I think all of those JIRAs can be pushed to the next
>> > release. The only one that's a must fix is PHOENIX-1930. Thomas is
>> looking
>> > at it now and should be able to give you a time estimate tomorrow for it.
>> > Thanks,
>> > James
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:37 PM, [email protected] <
>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > Devs,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks folks for picking up the JIRAs and fixing most of them in the
>> > > list quickly.
>> > >
>> > > PHOENIX-628 & PHOENIX-1710 are in progress. James any idea how much
>> > > time they will take to commit?
>> > > I can wait for one more day to complete the work.
>> > >
>> > > Still no work started at below JIRAs and since they are improvements I
>> > > think we can move them to next version.
>> > > - PHOENIX-1673
>> > > - PHOENIX-1727
>> > > - PHOENIX-1819
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Rajeshbabu.
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:57 AM, [email protected] <
>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Devs,
>> > >>
>> > >> I have created branches  4.4-HBase-1.0 and 4.4-HBase-1.1  from master
>> > >> to work with 1.0.x and 1.1.x respectively.
>> > >> If any changes further should be committed to the branches as well.
>> > >> Please don't miss.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Rajeshbabu.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Sergey Belousov <
>> > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> I am interested in it (kind of show stopper for us) but I am totally
>> > >>> swamp.
>> > >>> at work at home... just one of thouse periods.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> hopefully will have some brake next month or earlier.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> sorry
>> > >>> On Apr 22, 2015 4:38 PM, "[email protected]" <
>> > >>> [email protected]>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > Thanks all for pointing and working on the JIRA.
>> > >>> > Some of them already committed. Thanks Eli, Samarth Jain,Cody
>> > >>> > Marcel for quick turn around.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > @Samarth
>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1819
>> > >>> > When we can expect the patch for this?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > If we are not able to complete the list by tomorrow then I can
>> > >>> > take RC around next Tuesday.
>> > >>> > By the mean time I will create branches for 1.0.x and 1.1(If it's
>> > >>> > ok) as well and see the health of it(do some testing).
>> > >>> > What do you say?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > I think no progress for PHOENIX-1673. Any one want to take it?
>> > >>> > @Sergey Belousov are you interested in it?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Thanks,
>> > >>> > Rajeshbabu.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Sergey Belousov <
>> > >>> > [email protected]>
>> > >>> > wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > > would be  nice if
>> > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1673
>> > >>> > > makes to 4.4
>> > >>> > >  On Apr 22, 2015 11:42 AM, "Cody Marcel"
>> > >>> > > <[email protected]>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > > I have sort of combined PHOENIX-1728
>> > >>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1728> and
>> > >>> PHOENIX-1729
>> > >>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1729>. I
>> > >>> > > > hopefully
>> > >>> will
>> > >>> > > > have
>> > >>> > > > a pull request today for those. PHOENIX-1727
>> > >>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1727> will
>> > >>> > > > likely
>> > >>> be a
>> > >>> > > bit
>> > >>> > > > before I can work on. Work internally, particularly support
>> > >>> > > > for
>> > >>> mixed
>> > >>> > r/w
>> > >>> > > > workloads (not sure if there is a Jira yet) seems to be higher
>> > >>> > priority.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:32 PM, James Taylor <
>> > >>> [email protected]>
>> > >>> > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > > Another couple that need to go into 4.4.0 release IMO are
>> > >>> > PHOENIX-1728
>> > >>> > > > > (Pherf - Make tests use mini cluster so that unit test run
>> > >>> > > > > at
>> > >>> build
>> > >>> > > > > time) and PHOENIX-1727 (Pherf - Port shell scripts to
>> python).
>> > >>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > >>> > > > > James
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, James Taylor <
>> > >>> > [email protected]
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > You're welcome (and Samarth did the work). Thanks,
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >     James
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 AM, [email protected]
>> > >>> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > >> That's really great work James. Thanks for pointing.
>> > >>> > > > > >>
>> > >>> > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:47 AM, James Taylor <
>> > >>> > > > [email protected]>
>> > >>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > >>
>> > >>> > > > > >>> Good list, Rajeshbabu. Thanks for starting the RC
>> > >>> > > > > >>> process. One
>> > >>> > more
>> > >>> > > > of
>> > >>> > > > > >>> note that's already in:
>> > >>> > > > > >>>
>> > >>> > > > > >>> - 7.5x performance improvement for non aggregate,
>> > >>> > > > > >>> unordered
>> > >>> > queries
>> > >>> > > > > >>> (PHOENIX-1779).
>> > >>> > > > > >>>
>> > >>> > > > > >>> Thanks,
>> > >>> > > > > >>> James
>> > >>> > > > > >>>
>> > >>> > > > > >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, [email protected]
>> > >>> > > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > >>> > That's good to have Eli. I have marked 4.4.0 as fix
>> > >>> > > > > >>> > version
>> > >>> for
>> > >>> > > the
>> > >>> > > > > JIRA.
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >
>> > >>> > > > > >>> > Thanks,
>> > >>> > > > > >>> > Rajeshbabu.
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >
>> > >>> > > > > >>> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Eli Levine <
>> > >>> > [email protected]
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> Rajesh, I'm harboring hopes of getting PHOENIX-900
>> > >>> completed
>> > >>> > by
>> > >>> > > > > >>> Thursday.
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> Hopefully it'll end up in 4.4. I'll keep you posted.
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> Thanks
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> Eli
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:42 PM,
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> [email protected] < [email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > I'd like to propose we can have 4.4.0 RC on
>> Thursday.
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > We have got a lot of great stuff in 4.4.0 already:
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - 60 bug fixed(which includes fixes from 4.3.1)
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Spart integration
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Query server
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Union All support
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Pherf - load tester measures throughput
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Many math and date/time buit-in functions
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - MR job to populate indexes
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Support for 1.0.x (create new 4.4.0 branch for
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > this)
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - PHOENIX-538 Support UDFs JIRA is very close.
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > Is there any others that we should try to get in?
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > Thanks,
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > Rajeshbabu.
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > >>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >>> > > > > >>>
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>>

Reply via email to