Thanks, Rajeshbabu. I think all of those JIRAs can be pushed to the next release. The only one that's a must fix is PHOENIX-1930. Thomas is looking at it now and should be able to give you a time estimate tomorrow for it. Thanks, James
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:37 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Devs, > > Thanks folks for picking up the JIRAs and fixing most of them in the list > quickly. > > PHOENIX-628 & PHOENIX-1710 are in progress. James any idea how much time > they will take to commit? > I can wait for one more day to complete the work. > > Still no work started at below JIRAs and since they are improvements I > think we can move them to next version. > - PHOENIX-1673 > - PHOENIX-1727 > - PHOENIX-1819 > > Thanks, > Rajeshbabu. > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:57 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> >> I have created branches 4.4-HBase-1.0 and 4.4-HBase-1.1 from master to >> work with 1.0.x and 1.1.x respectively. >> If any changes further should be committed to the branches as well. Please >> don't miss. >> >> Thanks, >> Rajeshbabu. >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Sergey Belousov < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am interested in it (kind of show stopper for us) but I am totally >>> swamp. >>> at work at home... just one of thouse periods. >>> >>> hopefully will have some brake next month or earlier. >>> >>> sorry >>> On Apr 22, 2015 4:38 PM, "[email protected]" < >>> [email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Thanks all for pointing and working on the JIRA. >>> > Some of them already committed. Thanks Eli, Samarth Jain,Cody Marcel for >>> > quick turn around. >>> > >>> > @Samarth >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1819 >>> > When we can expect the patch for this? >>> > >>> > If we are not able to complete the list by tomorrow then I can take RC >>> > around next Tuesday. >>> > By the mean time I will create branches for 1.0.x and 1.1(If it's ok) as >>> > well and see the health of it(do some testing). >>> > What do you say? >>> > >>> > I think no progress for PHOENIX-1673. Any one want to take it? >>> > @Sergey Belousov are you interested in it? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Rajeshbabu. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Sergey Belousov < >>> > [email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > would be nice if >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1673 >>> > > makes to 4.4 >>> > > On Apr 22, 2015 11:42 AM, "Cody Marcel" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > I have sort of combined PHOENIX-1728 >>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1728> and >>> PHOENIX-1729 >>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1729>. I hopefully >>> will >>> > > > have >>> > > > a pull request today for those. PHOENIX-1727 >>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1727> will likely >>> be a >>> > > bit >>> > > > before I can work on. Work internally, particularly support for >>> mixed >>> > r/w >>> > > > workloads (not sure if there is a Jira yet) seems to be higher >>> > priority. >>> > > > >>> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:32 PM, James Taylor < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > Another couple that need to go into 4.4.0 release IMO are >>> > PHOENIX-1728 >>> > > > > (Pherf - Make tests use mini cluster so that unit test run at >>> build >>> > > > > time) and PHOENIX-1727 (Pherf - Port shell scripts to python). >>> > > > > Thanks, >>> > > > > James >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, James Taylor < >>> > [email protected] >>> > > > >>> > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > You're welcome (and Samarth did the work). Thanks, >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > James >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 AM, [email protected] >>> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > >> That's really great work James. Thanks for pointing. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:47 AM, James Taylor < >>> > > > [email protected]> >>> > > > > >> wrote: >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> Good list, Rajeshbabu. Thanks for starting the RC process. One >>> > more >>> > > > of >>> > > > > >>> note that's already in: >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> - 7.5x performance improvement for non aggregate, unordered >>> > queries >>> > > > > >>> (PHOENIX-1779). >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> Thanks, >>> > > > > >>> James >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, [email protected] >>> > > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > That's good to have Eli. I have marked 4.4.0 as fix version >>> for >>> > > the >>> > > > > JIRA. >>> > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > >>> > Thanks, >>> > > > > >>> > Rajeshbabu. >>> > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > >>> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Eli Levine < >>> > [email protected] >>> > > > >>> > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > >>> > > > > >>> >> Rajesh, I'm harboring hopes of getting PHOENIX-900 >>> completed >>> > by >>> > > > > >>> Thursday. >>> > > > > >>> >> Hopefully it'll end up in 4.4. I'll keep you posted. >>> > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >> Thanks >>> > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >> Eli >>> > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:42 PM, [email protected] < >>> > > > > >>> >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >> > I'd like to propose we can have 4.4.0 RC on Thursday. >>> > > > > >>> >> > We have got a lot of great stuff in 4.4.0 already: >>> > > > > >>> >> > - 60 bug fixed(which includes fixes from 4.3.1) >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Spart integration >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Query server >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Union All support >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Pherf - load tester measures throughput >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Many math and date/time buit-in functions >>> > > > > >>> >> > - MR job to populate indexes >>> > > > > >>> >> > - Support for 1.0.x (create new 4.4.0 branch for this) >>> > > > > >>> >> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > - PHOENIX-538 Support UDFs JIRA is very close. >>> > > > > >>> >> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > Is there any others that we should try to get in? >>> > > > > >>> >> > >>> > > > > >>> >> > Thanks, >>> > > > > >>> >> > Rajeshbabu. >>> > > > > >>> >> > >>> > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >>
