I ran the tests multiple times locally and they are always passing. [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.2:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ phoenix-assembly --- [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Apache Phoenix ..................................... SUCCESS [ 1.531 s] [INFO] Phoenix Core ....................................... SUCCESS [49:22 min] [INFO] Phoenix - Flume .................................... SUCCESS [01:09 min] [INFO] Phoenix - Pig ...................................... SUCCESS [03:04 min] [INFO] Phoenix Query Server Client ........................ SUCCESS [ 0.469 s] [INFO] Phoenix Query Server ............................... SUCCESS [01:47 min] [INFO] Phoenix - Pherf .................................... SUCCESS [01:05 min] [INFO] Phoenix - Spark .................................... SUCCESS [ 3.735 s] [INFO] Phoenix Assembly ................................... SUCCESS [ 21.070 s] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 56:57 min [INFO] Finished at: 2015-05-24T14:21:52+05:30
The reason for failures in Jenkings might be HBase 1.1.0 jars are older ones of it's RCs so getting linkage errors. Once we remove them from local repository then it will download latest jars and the tests should pass. Any one have an idea how to remove the jars form local repository of jenkins machines? Even with -U for mvn it's not downloading the latest jars. By the time will compare performance with other versions. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > I have pushed PHOENIX-1763 and PHOENIX-1681 to master, 4.4-HBase-1.1, and > 4.x-HBase-1.1 branches. > > I think one unit test is failing (IndexToolIT) which Rajesh is taking a > look. > > Enis > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Makes sense. > > > > +1 for cutting the RC from the 4.4 release tag. So in your above plan, I > > would change step 3 into: > > (3) Create the 4.4-branch from 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag > > > > Then we can commit PHOENIX-1763 and PHOENIX-1681 to 4.4-HBase-1.1, > > 4.x-HBase-1.1 and master. > > > > For Phoenix master branch, and 4.5 releases, I think we can drop > HBase-1.0 > > support if we think that there is a lot of overhead. HBase-1.1 is rolling > > upgradable and compatible with 1.0, so users should not be stuck with it > > for a long time. it is a matter of overhead of keeping one extra branch > and > > release vs whether we would want to support Hbase-1.0 users for 4.5+. > Just > > my 2 cents. > > > > Enis > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:39 PM, [email protected] < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Makes sense Nick. Cut the new branch from 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Rajeshbabu. > >> > >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > This looks good except for (1) branch should be cut from the > >> > 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag. That way 4.4.0 will be feature-identical across > all > >> > releases. Then we'll need to go back over what's landed on > 4.x-HBase-1.0 > >> > since 4.4.0 was released and bring forward any patches, so that all 3 > >> > branches are aligned for 4.4.1. > >> > > >> > Make sense? > >> > > >> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, [email protected] < > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Thanks James. Sure I will run it also. > >> > > > >> > > Here is my plan for the release: > >> > > > >> > > 1) create the 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch from latest 4.x-HBase-1.0 > >> > > 2) change the hbase version to 1.1.0 and commit PHOENIX-1793 > >> > > 3) Setup jenkins for the branch to run the test suite. > >> > > 3) cut rc from 4.x-HBase-1.1 > >> > > 4) before vote is going to pass create 4.4-HBase-1.1 branch for > 4.4.x > >> bug > >> > > fix releases. > >> > > > >> > > I > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Rajeshbabu. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, James Taylor < > [email protected] > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Rajeshbabu, > >> > > > Sounds good. Probably a good idea to run our perf regression suite > >> to > >> > > > get an idea of performance too. I'm fine with a release, though. > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > James > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:09 AM, [email protected] > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > James, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I have installed HBase 1.1.0 with phoenix-4.4.0-HBase-1.0 rc1 + > >> > > > > PHOENIX-1763 patch at server side. Created > tables,indexes,uploaded > >> > data > >> > > > > with performance script from the new client and performed > >> > reads/writes > >> > > > from > >> > > > > all old clients of versions 4.1.0,4.2.2 and 4.3.1. No issues > >> found. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > So I feel we can release with HBase-1.1.0. Running test suite > and > >> > seems > >> > > > > fine. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > Rajeshbabu. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:05 AM, [email protected] < > >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> James, > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> bq. Will older Phoenix 4.x clients work with the new Phoenix > 4.4 > >> > > clients > >> > > > >> against an HBase 1.1 running Phoenix? > >> > > > >> Mostly they should work. I will quickly check this today. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> bq. Has Andy's patch already been applied for using > >> > > > >> the new RS interfaces? > >> > > > >> The patch at PHOENIX-1763 has required changes after new RS > >> > interface > >> > > > >> changes. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Thanks, > >> > > > >> Rajeshbabu > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:32 PM, James Taylor < > >> > > [email protected]> > >> > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >>> Will older Phoenix 4.x clients work with the new Phoenix 4.4 > >> > clients > >> > > > >>> against an HBase 1.1 running Phoenix? If no, we'll need to > >> release > >> > > > >>> this in a 5.0 version. Has Andy's patch already been applied > for > >> > > using > >> > > > >>> the new RS interfaces? > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> Thanks, > >> > > > >>> James > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:30 AM, [email protected] > >> > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >>> > Hi, > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > Already HBase-1.1.0 released and we already have patch to > >> support > >> > > > with > >> > > > >>> > it(PHOENIX-1763). I feel we can release 4.4.0 with > >> HBase-1.1.0 as > >> > > > well. > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > What do you guys say? > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > Thanks, > >> > > > >>> > Rajeshbabu. > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
