This issue is not there in 1.1.0.. It might be some jar improper verison
issue?
org/apache/hadoop/hbase/NoTagsKeyValue
at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV2$ScannerV2.
formNoTagsKeyValue(HFileReaderV2.java:755)
at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV3$ScannerV3.
getKeyValue(HFileReaderV3.java:206)
at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.
seek(StoreFileScanner.java:161)
at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.
backwardSeek(StoreFileScanner.java:478)
As per this trace itself, it is not 1.1.0 hbase-server.jar. But the
common jar may be 1.1.0 only and that is why not able to see the new class..
-Anoop-
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looking at
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Phoenix-4.4-HBase-1.1/2/testReport/org.apache.phoenix.end2end/GroupByCaseIT/org_apache_phoenix_end2end_GroupByCaseIT/
> :
>
> Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.DoNotRetryIOException:
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.DoNotRetryIOException:
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/hadoop/hbase/NoTagsKeyValue
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2151)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:101)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:130)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:107)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/hadoop/hbase/NoTagsKeyValue
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV2$ScannerV2.formNoTagsKeyValue(HFileReaderV2.java:755)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV3$ScannerV3.getKeyValue(HFileReaderV3.java:206)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.seek(StoreFileScanner.java:161)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.backwardSeek(StoreFileScanner.java:478)
>
>
> NoTagsKeyValue was introduced by:
>
> HBASE-13579 - Avoid isCellTTLExpired() for NO-TAG cases (Ram)
>
> which was marked for 1.1.1
>
>
> FYI
>
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:04 AM, [email protected] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ted,
> >
> > Tests are failing for both the branches and master branch as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rajeshbabu.
> > On May 24, 2015 7:21 PM, "Ted Yu" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Did the test fail on branch 4.4-HBase-1.1, branch 4.x-HBase-1.1 or
> both ?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 2:38 AM, [email protected] <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I ran the tests multiple times locally and they are always passing.
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.2:attach-descriptor
> (attach-descriptor)
> > @
> > > > phoenix-assembly ---
> > > > [INFO]
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> > > > [INFO]
> > > > [INFO] Apache Phoenix ..................................... SUCCESS [
> > > > 1.531 s]
> > > > [INFO] Phoenix Core ....................................... SUCCESS
> > > [49:22
> > > > min]
> > > > [INFO] Phoenix - Flume .................................... SUCCESS
> > > [01:09
> > > > min]
> > > > [INFO] Phoenix - Pig ...................................... SUCCESS
> > > [03:04
> > > > min]
> > > > [INFO] Phoenix Query Server Client ........................ SUCCESS [
> > > > 0.469 s]
> > > > [INFO] Phoenix Query Server ............................... SUCCESS
> > > [01:47
> > > > min]
> > > > [INFO] Phoenix - Pherf .................................... SUCCESS
> > > [01:05
> > > > min]
> > > > [INFO] Phoenix - Spark .................................... SUCCESS [
> > > > 3.735 s]
> > > > [INFO] Phoenix Assembly ................................... SUCCESS [
> > > > 21.070 s]
> > > > [INFO]
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> > > > [INFO]
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > [INFO] Total time: 56:57 min
> > > > [INFO] Finished at: 2015-05-24T14:21:52+05:30
> > > >
> > > > The reason for failures in Jenkings might be HBase 1.1.0 jars are
> older
> > > > ones of it's RCs so getting linkage errors.
> > > > Once we remove them from local repository then it will download
> latest
> > > jars
> > > > and the tests should pass.
> > > > Any one have an idea how to remove the jars form local repository of
> > > > jenkins machines?
> > > >
> > > > Even with -U for mvn it's not downloading the latest jars.
> > > > By the time will compare performance with other versions.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Rajeshbabu.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have pushed PHOENIX-1763 and PHOENIX-1681 to master,
> 4.4-HBase-1.1,
> > > and
> > > > > 4.x-HBase-1.1 branches.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think one unit test is failing (IndexToolIT) which Rajesh is
> > taking a
> > > > > look.
> > > > >
> > > > > Enis
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Makes sense.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for cutting the RC from the 4.4 release tag. So in your above
> > > plan,
> > > > I
> > > > > > would change step 3 into:
> > > > > > (3) Create the 4.4-branch from 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then we can commit PHOENIX-1763 and PHOENIX-1681 to
> 4.4-HBase-1.1,
> > > > > > 4.x-HBase-1.1 and master.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For Phoenix master branch, and 4.5 releases, I think we can drop
> > > > > HBase-1.0
> > > > > > support if we think that there is a lot of overhead. HBase-1.1 is
> > > > rolling
> > > > > > upgradable and compatible with 1.0, so users should not be stuck
> > with
> > > > it
> > > > > > for a long time. it is a matter of overhead of keeping one extra
> > > branch
> > > > > and
> > > > > > release vs whether we would want to support Hbase-1.0 users for
> > 4.5+.
> > > > > Just
> > > > > > my 2 cents.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Enis
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:39 PM, [email protected] <
> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Makes sense Nick. Cut the new branch from 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Rajeshbabu.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Nick Dimiduk <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > This looks good except for (1) branch should be cut from the
> > > > > >> > 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag. That way 4.4.0 will be feature-identical
> > > across
> > > > > all
> > > > > >> > releases. Then we'll need to go back over what's landed on
> > > > > 4.x-HBase-1.0
> > > > > >> > since 4.4.0 was released and bring forward any patches, so
> that
> > > all
> > > > 3
> > > > > >> > branches are aligned for 4.4.1.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Make sense?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, [email protected] <
> > > > > >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Thanks James. Sure I will run it also.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Here is my plan for the release:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > 1) create the 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch from latest 4.x-HBase-1.0
> > > > > >> > > 2) change the hbase version to 1.1.0 and commit PHOENIX-1793
> > > > > >> > > 3) Setup jenkins for the branch to run the test suite.
> > > > > >> > > 3) cut rc from 4.x-HBase-1.1
> > > > > >> > > 4) before vote is going to pass create 4.4-HBase-1.1 branch
> > for
> > > > > 4.4.x
> > > > > >> bug
> > > > > >> > > fix releases.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > I
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > Rajeshbabu.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, James Taylor <
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > Hi Rajeshbabu,
> > > > > >> > > > Sounds good. Probably a good idea to run our perf
> regression
> > > > suite
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> > > > get an idea of performance too. I'm fine with a release,
> > > though.
> > > > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > James
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:09 AM, [email protected]
> > > > > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > James,
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > I have installed HBase 1.1.0 with
> phoenix-4.4.0-HBase-1.0
> > > rc1
> > > > +
> > > > > >> > > > > PHOENIX-1763 patch at server side. Created
> > > > > tables,indexes,uploaded
> > > > > >> > data
> > > > > >> > > > > with performance script from the new client and
> performed
> > > > > >> > reads/writes
> > > > > >> > > > from
> > > > > >> > > > > all old clients of versions 4.1.0,4.2.2 and 4.3.1. No
> > issues
> > > > > >> found.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > So I feel we can release with HBase-1.1.0. Running test
> > > suite
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> > seems
> > > > > >> > > > > fine.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > > Rajeshbabu.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:05 AM, [email protected]
> <
> > > > > >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> James,
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> bq. Will older Phoenix 4.x clients work with the new
> > > Phoenix
> > > > > 4.4
> > > > > >> > > clients
> > > > > >> > > > >> against an HBase 1.1 running Phoenix?
> > > > > >> > > > >> Mostly they should work. I will quickly check this
> today.
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> bq. Has Andy's patch already been applied for using
> > > > > >> > > > >> the new RS interfaces?
> > > > > >> > > > >> The patch at PHOENIX-1763 has required changes after
> new
> > RS
> > > > > >> > interface
> > > > > >> > > > >> changes.
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > >> Rajeshbabu
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:32 PM, James Taylor <
> > > > > >> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >>> Will older Phoenix 4.x clients work with the new
> Phoenix
> > > 4.4
> > > > > >> > clients
> > > > > >> > > > >>> against an HBase 1.1 running Phoenix? If no, we'll
> need
> > to
> > > > > >> release
> > > > > >> > > > >>> this in a 5.0 version. Has Andy's patch already been
> > > applied
> > > > > for
> > > > > >> > > using
> > > > > >> > > > >>> the new RS interfaces?
> > > > > >> > > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > >>> James
> > > > > >> > > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > > >>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:30 AM,
> [email protected]
> > > > > >> > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >>> > Hi,
> > > > > >> > > > >>> >
> > > > > >> > > > >>> > Already HBase-1.1.0 released and we already have
> patch
> > > to
> > > > > >> support
> > > > > >> > > > with
> > > > > >> > > > >>> > it(PHOENIX-1763). I feel we can release 4.4.0 with
> > > > > >> HBase-1.1.0 as
> > > > > >> > > > well.
> > > > > >> > > > >>> >
> > > > > >> > > > >>> > What do you guys say?
> > > > > >> > > > >>> >
> > > > > >> > > > >>> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > >>> > Rajeshbabu.
> > > > > >> > > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
