Did the test fail on branch 4.4-HBase-1.1, branch 4.x-HBase-1.1 or both ? Cheers
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 2:38 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > I ran the tests multiple times locally and they are always passing. > > [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.2:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ > phoenix-assembly --- > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > [INFO] > [INFO] Apache Phoenix ..................................... SUCCESS [ > 1.531 s] > [INFO] Phoenix Core ....................................... SUCCESS [49:22 > min] > [INFO] Phoenix - Flume .................................... SUCCESS [01:09 > min] > [INFO] Phoenix - Pig ...................................... SUCCESS [03:04 > min] > [INFO] Phoenix Query Server Client ........................ SUCCESS [ > 0.469 s] > [INFO] Phoenix Query Server ............................... SUCCESS [01:47 > min] > [INFO] Phoenix - Pherf .................................... SUCCESS [01:05 > min] > [INFO] Phoenix - Spark .................................... SUCCESS [ > 3.735 s] > [INFO] Phoenix Assembly ................................... SUCCESS [ > 21.070 s] > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Total time: 56:57 min > [INFO] Finished at: 2015-05-24T14:21:52+05:30 > > The reason for failures in Jenkings might be HBase 1.1.0 jars are older > ones of it's RCs so getting linkage errors. > Once we remove them from local repository then it will download latest jars > and the tests should pass. > Any one have an idea how to remove the jars form local repository of > jenkins machines? > > Even with -U for mvn it's not downloading the latest jars. > By the time will compare performance with other versions. > > Thanks, > Rajeshbabu. > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have pushed PHOENIX-1763 and PHOENIX-1681 to master, 4.4-HBase-1.1, and > > 4.x-HBase-1.1 branches. > > > > I think one unit test is failing (IndexToolIT) which Rajesh is taking a > > look. > > > > Enis > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Makes sense. > > > > > > +1 for cutting the RC from the 4.4 release tag. So in your above plan, > I > > > would change step 3 into: > > > (3) Create the 4.4-branch from 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag > > > > > > Then we can commit PHOENIX-1763 and PHOENIX-1681 to 4.4-HBase-1.1, > > > 4.x-HBase-1.1 and master. > > > > > > For Phoenix master branch, and 4.5 releases, I think we can drop > > HBase-1.0 > > > support if we think that there is a lot of overhead. HBase-1.1 is > rolling > > > upgradable and compatible with 1.0, so users should not be stuck with > it > > > for a long time. it is a matter of overhead of keeping one extra branch > > and > > > release vs whether we would want to support Hbase-1.0 users for 4.5+. > > Just > > > my 2 cents. > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:39 PM, [email protected] < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Makes sense Nick. Cut the new branch from 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Rajeshbabu. > > >> > > >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > This looks good except for (1) branch should be cut from the > > >> > 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag. That way 4.4.0 will be feature-identical across > > all > > >> > releases. Then we'll need to go back over what's landed on > > 4.x-HBase-1.0 > > >> > since 4.4.0 was released and bring forward any patches, so that all > 3 > > >> > branches are aligned for 4.4.1. > > >> > > > >> > Make sense? > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, [email protected] < > > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Thanks James. Sure I will run it also. > > >> > > > > >> > > Here is my plan for the release: > > >> > > > > >> > > 1) create the 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch from latest 4.x-HBase-1.0 > > >> > > 2) change the hbase version to 1.1.0 and commit PHOENIX-1793 > > >> > > 3) Setup jenkins for the branch to run the test suite. > > >> > > 3) cut rc from 4.x-HBase-1.1 > > >> > > 4) before vote is going to pass create 4.4-HBase-1.1 branch for > > 4.4.x > > >> bug > > >> > > fix releases. > > >> > > > > >> > > I > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Rajeshbabu. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, James Taylor < > > [email protected] > > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi Rajeshbabu, > > >> > > > Sounds good. Probably a good idea to run our perf regression > suite > > >> to > > >> > > > get an idea of performance too. I'm fine with a release, though. > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > James > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:09 AM, [email protected] > > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > James, > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I have installed HBase 1.1.0 with phoenix-4.4.0-HBase-1.0 rc1 > + > > >> > > > > PHOENIX-1763 patch at server side. Created > > tables,indexes,uploaded > > >> > data > > >> > > > > with performance script from the new client and performed > > >> > reads/writes > > >> > > > from > > >> > > > > all old clients of versions 4.1.0,4.2.2 and 4.3.1. No issues > > >> found. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > So I feel we can release with HBase-1.1.0. Running test suite > > and > > >> > seems > > >> > > > > fine. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > Rajeshbabu. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:05 AM, [email protected] < > > >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> James, > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> bq. Will older Phoenix 4.x clients work with the new Phoenix > > 4.4 > > >> > > clients > > >> > > > >> against an HBase 1.1 running Phoenix? > > >> > > > >> Mostly they should work. I will quickly check this today. > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> bq. Has Andy's patch already been applied for using > > >> > > > >> the new RS interfaces? > > >> > > > >> The patch at PHOENIX-1763 has required changes after new RS > > >> > interface > > >> > > > >> changes. > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > > >> Rajeshbabu > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:32 PM, James Taylor < > > >> > > [email protected]> > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >>> Will older Phoenix 4.x clients work with the new Phoenix 4.4 > > >> > clients > > >> > > > >>> against an HBase 1.1 running Phoenix? If no, we'll need to > > >> release > > >> > > > >>> this in a 5.0 version. Has Andy's patch already been applied > > for > > >> > > using > > >> > > > >>> the new RS interfaces? > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> Thanks, > > >> > > > >>> James > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:30 AM, [email protected] > > >> > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >>> > Hi, > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > Already HBase-1.1.0 released and we already have patch to > > >> support > > >> > > > with > > >> > > > >>> > it(PHOENIX-1763). I feel we can release 4.4.0 with > > >> HBase-1.1.0 as > > >> > > > well. > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > What do you guys say? > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > Thanks, > > >> > > > >>> > Rajeshbabu. > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
