Hi Ted, Tests are failing for both the branches and master branch as well.
Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On May 24, 2015 7:21 PM, "Ted Yu" <[email protected]> wrote: > Did the test fail on branch 4.4-HBase-1.1, branch 4.x-HBase-1.1 or both ? > > Cheers > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 2:38 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > I ran the tests multiple times locally and they are always passing. > > > > [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.2:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ > > phoenix-assembly --- > > [INFO] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > > [INFO] > > [INFO] Apache Phoenix ..................................... SUCCESS [ > > 1.531 s] > > [INFO] Phoenix Core ....................................... SUCCESS > [49:22 > > min] > > [INFO] Phoenix - Flume .................................... SUCCESS > [01:09 > > min] > > [INFO] Phoenix - Pig ...................................... SUCCESS > [03:04 > > min] > > [INFO] Phoenix Query Server Client ........................ SUCCESS [ > > 0.469 s] > > [INFO] Phoenix Query Server ............................... SUCCESS > [01:47 > > min] > > [INFO] Phoenix - Pherf .................................... SUCCESS > [01:05 > > min] > > [INFO] Phoenix - Spark .................................... SUCCESS [ > > 3.735 s] > > [INFO] Phoenix Assembly ................................... SUCCESS [ > > 21.070 s] > > [INFO] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > > [INFO] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] Total time: 56:57 min > > [INFO] Finished at: 2015-05-24T14:21:52+05:30 > > > > The reason for failures in Jenkings might be HBase 1.1.0 jars are older > > ones of it's RCs so getting linkage errors. > > Once we remove them from local repository then it will download latest > jars > > and the tests should pass. > > Any one have an idea how to remove the jars form local repository of > > jenkins machines? > > > > Even with -U for mvn it's not downloading the latest jars. > > By the time will compare performance with other versions. > > > > Thanks, > > Rajeshbabu. > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I have pushed PHOENIX-1763 and PHOENIX-1681 to master, 4.4-HBase-1.1, > and > > > 4.x-HBase-1.1 branches. > > > > > > I think one unit test is failing (IndexToolIT) which Rajesh is taking a > > > look. > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Makes sense. > > > > > > > > +1 for cutting the RC from the 4.4 release tag. So in your above > plan, > > I > > > > would change step 3 into: > > > > (3) Create the 4.4-branch from 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag > > > > > > > > Then we can commit PHOENIX-1763 and PHOENIX-1681 to 4.4-HBase-1.1, > > > > 4.x-HBase-1.1 and master. > > > > > > > > For Phoenix master branch, and 4.5 releases, I think we can drop > > > HBase-1.0 > > > > support if we think that there is a lot of overhead. HBase-1.1 is > > rolling > > > > upgradable and compatible with 1.0, so users should not be stuck with > > it > > > > for a long time. it is a matter of overhead of keeping one extra > branch > > > and > > > > release vs whether we would want to support Hbase-1.0 users for 4.5+. > > > Just > > > > my 2 cents. > > > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:39 PM, [email protected] < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Makes sense Nick. Cut the new branch from 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Rajeshbabu. > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > This looks good except for (1) branch should be cut from the > > > >> > 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 tag. That way 4.4.0 will be feature-identical > across > > > all > > > >> > releases. Then we'll need to go back over what's landed on > > > 4.x-HBase-1.0 > > > >> > since 4.4.0 was released and bring forward any patches, so that > all > > 3 > > > >> > branches are aligned for 4.4.1. > > > >> > > > > >> > Make sense? > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, [email protected] < > > > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks James. Sure I will run it also. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Here is my plan for the release: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 1) create the 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch from latest 4.x-HBase-1.0 > > > >> > > 2) change the hbase version to 1.1.0 and commit PHOENIX-1793 > > > >> > > 3) Setup jenkins for the branch to run the test suite. > > > >> > > 3) cut rc from 4.x-HBase-1.1 > > > >> > > 4) before vote is going to pass create 4.4-HBase-1.1 branch for > > > 4.4.x > > > >> bug > > > >> > > fix releases. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > Rajeshbabu. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, James Taylor < > > > [email protected] > > > >> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hi Rajeshbabu, > > > >> > > > Sounds good. Probably a good idea to run our perf regression > > suite > > > >> to > > > >> > > > get an idea of performance too. I'm fine with a release, > though. > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > > >> > > > James > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:09 AM, [email protected] > > > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > James, > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I have installed HBase 1.1.0 with phoenix-4.4.0-HBase-1.0 > rc1 > > + > > > >> > > > > PHOENIX-1763 patch at server side. Created > > > tables,indexes,uploaded > > > >> > data > > > >> > > > > with performance script from the new client and performed > > > >> > reads/writes > > > >> > > > from > > > >> > > > > all old clients of versions 4.1.0,4.2.2 and 4.3.1. No issues > > > >> found. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > So I feel we can release with HBase-1.1.0. Running test > suite > > > and > > > >> > seems > > > >> > > > > fine. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > Rajeshbabu. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:05 AM, [email protected] < > > > >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> James, > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> bq. Will older Phoenix 4.x clients work with the new > Phoenix > > > 4.4 > > > >> > > clients > > > >> > > > >> against an HBase 1.1 running Phoenix? > > > >> > > > >> Mostly they should work. I will quickly check this today. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> bq. Has Andy's patch already been applied for using > > > >> > > > >> the new RS interfaces? > > > >> > > > >> The patch at PHOENIX-1763 has required changes after new RS > > > >> > interface > > > >> > > > >> changes. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> > > > >> Rajeshbabu > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:32 PM, James Taylor < > > > >> > > [email protected]> > > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> Will older Phoenix 4.x clients work with the new Phoenix > 4.4 > > > >> > clients > > > >> > > > >>> against an HBase 1.1 running Phoenix? If no, we'll need to > > > >> release > > > >> > > > >>> this in a 5.0 version. Has Andy's patch already been > applied > > > for > > > >> > > using > > > >> > > > >>> the new RS interfaces? > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >> > > > >>> James > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:30 AM, [email protected] > > > >> > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> > Hi, > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > Already HBase-1.1.0 released and we already have patch > to > > > >> support > > > >> > > > with > > > >> > > > >>> > it(PHOENIX-1763). I feel we can release 4.4.0 with > > > >> HBase-1.1.0 as > > > >> > > > well. > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > What do you guys say? > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > >>> > Thanks, > > > >> > > > >>> > Rajeshbabu. > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
