IDProperty might benefit. Not sure about @BXML, but probably. On Aug 8, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Chris Bartlett wrote:
> I thought they were included by default (if you can excuse the pun), > but only realised that DefaultProperty wasn't when I went looking for > it just now. > > I take it you have no objection to me adding it then? > Any thoughts about other Pivot annotations? > > On 8 August 2011 20:02, Greg Brown <gk_br...@verizon.net> wrote: >> That's cool - I was not aware of that feature. >> >> On Aug 8, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Chris Bartlett wrote: >> >>> Is there any reason why the DefaultProperty annotation is not >>> annotated itself with java.lang.annotation.Documented? >>> >>> Doing so means that users will be able to see what WTK (or other) >>> classes are have the DefaultProperty annotation and its value by >>> looking at the Javadoc for that class. >>> >>> Are there any other Pivot annotations which would also benefit from this? >>> >>> Index: DefaultProperty.java >>> =================================================================== >>> --- DefaultProperty.java (revision 1153814) >>> +++ DefaultProperty.java (working copy) >>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ >>> */ >>> package org.apache.pivot.beans; >>> >>> +import java.lang.annotation.Documented; >>> import java.lang.annotation.ElementType; >>> import java.lang.annotation.Inherited; >>> import java.lang.annotation.Retention; >>> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ >>> * Specifies a property to which child elements will be added or set when an >>> * explicit property is not given. >>> */ >>> +@Documented >>> @Inherited >>> @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) >>> @Target(ElementType.TYPE) >> >>
