> I agree, but I suppose it might still be useful to see what custom > code uses the BXML annotation and therefore would require signing to > run in an applet.
How would you see it though, if the field isn't documented?
> I agree, but I suppose it might still be useful to see what custom > code uses the BXML annotation and therefore would require signing to > run in an applet.
How would you see it though, if the field isn't documented?