I agree, but I suppose it might still be useful to see what custom code uses the BXML annotation and therefore would require signing to run in an applet.
I'm creating a JIRA ticket now and adding a patch for all 3. On 8 August 2011 20:40, Greg Brown <gk_br...@verizon.net> wrote: >> Just played around with @BXML, and don't see much value there. > > If the fields are private (the common case) then I tend to agree, since they > wouldn't be Javadoc'ed anyways. > >
