+1 (binding)
I would also opt for a better name.
Julian
Am 02.09.19, 21:03 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
+1 (binding)
It should run through the ip clearance of the incubator as well as
potentially a name check, if we want to stick to crunch or for any alternate
name we might be coming up with (we should come up with the name before
creating the repo) guess if it's Somethong like "plc4x compute" or "plc4x
edge", we don't need that, but if it's a separate name, we should.
Chris
Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
________________________________
From: Julian Feinauer <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>
Sent: Monday, September 2, 2019 8:56:34 PM
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org <dev@plc4x.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X
Hi all,
as the discussion seems to slow down and to stabilizes in [1] I take the
freedom to start a vote.
The vote is ONLY about accepting the project CRUNCH [2] as a subproject to
PLC4X (its not about changing the TLPs Name, or changing the scope of the
project or other things that came up during the DISCUSS).
Before CRUNCH could be integrated it has to go through clearance from the
incubator before being integrated into the project but also a PMC Vote is
required. Also a name change is very likely as the current name conflicts with
Apache Crunch [3].
As usual the vote will be open for at least 72hours and the options are
+1 – accept CRUNCH as a subproject for PLC4X
0 – no opinion
-1 – do not accept CRUNCH as a subproject for PLC4X (please give reasons
for that)
Thanks
Julian
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/444ce99b0495e94177203ec4aff55dc91b8d78d8d9758ad0f8bb484f@%3Cdev.plc4x.apache.org%3E
[2] https://github.com/pragmaticminds/crunch
[3] http://crunch.apache.org/
