+1 (binding)

Naming does not matter for me. The CQ and Doc is there more important :P

Greetings Mathi
Matthias Strljic, M.Sc.

Universität Stuttgart
Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und 
Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW)

Seidenstraße 36
70174 Stuttgart

Tel: +49 711 685-84530
Fax: +49 711 685-74530

E-Mail: matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de
Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Julian Feinauer <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> 
Gesendet: Monday, September 2, 2019 8:57 PM
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X

Hi all,

as the discussion seems to slow down and to stabilizes in [1] I take the 
freedom to start a vote.
The vote is ONLY about accepting the project CRUNCH [2] as a subproject to 
PLC4X (its not about changing the TLPs Name, or changing the scope of the 
project or other things that came up during the DISCUSS).

Before CRUNCH could be integrated it has to go through clearance from the 
incubator before being integrated into the project but also a PMC Vote is 
required. Also a name change is very likely as the current name conflicts with 
Apache Crunch [3].

As usual the vote will be open for at least 72hours and the options are

+1 – accept CRUNCH as a subproject for PLC4X
0 – no opinion
-1 – do not accept CRUNCH as a subproject for PLC4X (please give reasons for 


[2] https://github.com/pragmaticminds/crunch
[3] http://crunch.apache.org/

Reply via email to