Hi,
F# and VB.Net both are crazy indeed : )
But, I agree with Björn I would prefer to keep it as .NET (DOTNET).
Julian
Am 03.04.20, 16:34 schrieb "Bjoern Hoeper" <hoe...@ltsoft.de>:
Some people are masochistic... ;)
Joking aside I think the more relevant option is F# which could be a good
match for some use cases
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2020 16:30
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP?
But VB?!?!?!?!
Am 03.04.20, 16:12 schrieb "Bjoern Hoeper" <hoe...@ltsoft.de>:
Hi,
in my opinion the runtime is the more relevant thing in this context
because if you take a .NET Lib you could use it with VB or F# or any other
language that is compatible with the .NET Runtime. So the language is only the
language in which it is written (which could also be intermixed). Furthermore
it is quite common to use something like NET e.g. log4j had an equivalent of
log4net.
Björn
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2020 15:43
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP?
Hi,
I just wanted to bring this to discussion … I have now encountered in
several projects that support different languages that the naming convention we
follow seems to match:
* C : xyz_c
* C++: xyz_cpp
* Python: xyz_py
However when it comes to C# we sort of named it “plc4dotnet” … I would
propose to change it to “plc4csharp” as this is the language … “dotnet” is sort
of more the runtime.
What do you think?
Chris
