On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:30 PM, David Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can also point at sender-id > > where we took a similar stance with sender-id: > > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/docs/sender-id-position.html > > Now it *IS* worth noting that "Sender ID" is part of OSP. So the comparison > with this email, the OSP and POI may be worthwhile discussing: > > http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx > > > Security > > > > RFC 4406 - Sender ID: Authenticating E-Mail > > RFC 4408 - Sender Policy Framework: Authorizing Use of Domains in "Mail > From" > > RFC 4407 - Purported Responsible Address in E-Mail Messages > > RFC 4405 - SMTP Service Extension for Indicating the Responsible Submitter > of an E-Mail Message > > I tried to look to see what SpamAssasin and JAMES projects have to say > about SenderID and OSP. Has the position changed regarding the ASF > sender-id-position letter. Does OSP help there?
To the best of my knowledge, it has not. But that's a subject for another list. > If so, then ... N/A - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
