Hi Sam,
On Apr 17, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:30 PM, David Fisher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can also point at sender-id
where we took a similar stance with sender-id:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/docs/sender-id-position.html
Now it *IS* worth noting that "Sender ID" is part of OSP. So the
comparison
with this email, the OSP and POI may be worthwhile discussing:
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx
Security
RFC 4406 - Sender ID: Authenticating E-Mail
RFC 4408 - Sender Policy Framework: Authorizing Use of Domains in
"Mail
From"
RFC 4407 - Purported Responsible Address in E-Mail Messages
RFC 4405 - SMTP Service Extension for Indicating the Responsible
Submitter
of an E-Mail Message
I tried to look to see what SpamAssasin and JAMES projects have
to say
about SenderID and OSP. Has the position changed regarding the ASF
sender-id-position letter. Does OSP help there?
To the best of my knowledge, it has not. But that's a subject for
another list.
And that list is the same as the one where you will discuss POI and
"ENCUMBERED", or different?
If so, then ...
N/A
OK, I am waiting patiently.
Best Regards,
Dave
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
