Hi Terry,
Terry Teague a �crit :
At 4:06 PM +0200 4/28/05, eric.bachard wrote:
Can you please verify, when OOo will be able to run, if everything is fine with libxmlsec1�
Ooops, typo : libxmlsec* of course
I'm not sure I understand the question. The 1.9m96 that I built runs fine on Mac OS X 10.3.5 or later, and there is a libxmlsec1.dylib and libxmlsec-nss.dylib, and appropriate symlinks in the program directory.
Ok, with more explanations : I have a circulary dependency problem with libxmlsec1. What follows is a simulation of what happens without change :
-rw-r--r-- 1 eric eric 0 2005-04-29 09:58 libxmlsec1.1.2.6.dylib
lrwxrwxrwx 1 eric eric 22 2005-04-29 10:03 libxmlsec1.1.2.6.jnilib -> libxmlsec1.1.2.6.dylib
lrwxrwxrwx 1 eric eric 18 2005-04-29 10:03 libxmlsec1.dylib -> libxmlsec1.dylib.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 eric eric 16 2005-04-29 10:03 libxmlsec1.dylib.1 -> libxmlsec1.dylib
Important : I have build m95 from clean sources, same problem with m97.
Unrelated, but I need to try building 1.9m9x in Mac OS X 10.3.3 (and eventually in Jaguar), because I still can NOT run OOo (including my build made on Mac OS X 10.3.9) on Mac OS X 10.3.3 because of a version incompatibility problem with libxml2(.2).
Always the version's mismatch ?
Can you please test a build using --with-system-xml for configure ? IMHO, it will probably help.
Regards, ericb
--
eric bachard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Francophone OpenOffice.org Commmunity developer (Linux PPC / Mac OS X / X11)
See : <http://fr.openoffice.org>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
