Wow, this is one very interesting rapidly developing arena. My
environment is 10.3.8 and with Darwin Ports. Can someone recommend the
most highly probably successful build of 1.9 to try? Should I go for
m96? m97? m98 with NAKATA's patches? The circular dependency
possibility, and the confusion on mozilla is also a bit crazy. Thanks
for anyone's suggestion for highest probability of success!

Best regards,

Sergio

P.S. (If I do not need Mozilla functionality with OOo, I do still need
to buil 1.9 m9[6-8] with the Mozilla packages for sure?)

On 4/30/05, Terry Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:24 AM +0200 4/29/05, eric.bachard wrote:
> >Hi Terry,
> 
> >Ok, with more explanations : I have a circulary dependency problem with
> >libxmlsec1. What follows is a simulation of what happens without change :
> >
> >-rw-r--r--  1 eric eric  0 2005-04-29 09:58 libxmlsec1.1.2.6.dylib
> >lrwxrwxrwx  1 eric eric 22 2005-04-29 10:03 libxmlsec1.1.2.6.jnilib ->
> >libxmlsec1.1.2.6.dylib
> >lrwxrwxrwx  1 eric eric 18 2005-04-29 10:03 libxmlsec1.dylib ->
> >libxmlsec1.dylib.1
> >lrwxrwxrwx  1 eric eric 16 2005-04-29 10:03 libxmlsec1.dylib.1 ->
> >libxmlsec1.dylib
> >
> >Important :  I have build m95 from clean sources, same problem with m97.
> 
> With my clean build of 1.9m97, I do have a circular dependency with the
> libxmlsec1-nss library BUT no circular dependencies with the libxmlsec1
> library itself. At least in the installed OOo_installation/program
> directory - I guess the above listing is from the solver directory.
> 
> 
> >>
> >> Unrelated, but I need to try building 1.9m9x in Mac OS X 10.3.3 (and
> >> eventually in Jaguar), because I still can NOT run OOo (including my build
> >> made on Mac OS X 10.3.9) on Mac OS X 10.3.3 because of a version
> >> incompatibility problem with libxml2(.2).
> >
> >Always the version's mismatch ?
> >
> >Can you please test a build using  --with-system-xml for configure ?
> >IMHO, it will probably help.
> 
> No, that didn't help - when running configure with that option, it detected
> libxml as "internal", whatever that means, and the SYSTEM_LIBXML
> environment variable was set to NO.
> 
> I'm going to try building in Jaguar next.
> 
> >Regards,
> >ericb
> 
> Regards, Terry
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to