Hi Andre and Sophie,

I want to clarify that I did look at the shakedown tests.  What I am proposing 
is either an extension of shake down tests or a different phase.

The current shake down verifies very basic functionality of OO Suite.  Its 
combination of installation and some functional (test basic program functions) 
tests.  I am suggesting that we add more performance (test how the program 
performs as an end user product) type tests.

Does that make sense?

Best Regards


> Hi Andre and Sophie,
> 
> I looked at smoke tests and at a basic set of tests required for QA release 
> of 
> localized builds.  
> 
> This is how I would approach both release testing and QA metrics for 
> stability 
> of build.  This may have already been discussed or covered elsewhere.  
> However, 
> I rather repeat something if it may help me or the team learn, then continue 
> working on this project with wrong assumptions.
> 
> 1.  Develop a matrix of standardized test files and standardized tests
> 1.1 To keep things simple, for each test file, I would have 3 levels of 
> complexity: Simple, Complex, Very Complex.
> 1.1.1 For example, to test Writer, we could have the following test files:
> 1.1.1.1 Simple:  A 10 page document where each page is written in a different 
> language and has a simple database, html code, a small picture, basic page 
> and 
> document formatting. 
> 1.1.1.1.1 The document can be set-up in such a way the any differences in 
> format 
> display are very noticable.
> 
> The testers would have a set of actions to perform.  For example: Open and 
> save 
> document, import it back. check to see that document has not changed, save in 
> different format, etc.
> 
> Build stability rating could then be assigned based on success of each test.  
>  
> The benefit of this approach is that it allows an objective evaluation of the 
> build.  There are different ways to calculate a stability rating.  Before I 
> get 
> into that and other details, I would like to get comments on this suggestion.
> 
> Best Regards
> Simon Rybalov
> 
> 
> > Hi Andre, all,
> > Andre Schnabel wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi sophie,
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>
> > >> Not sure if it's feasible, but may be we could form a international QA 
> > >> team with all languages mixed when we are testing a release for the 
> > >> 3rd time, roughly :
> > > 
> > > 
> > > as we have to wait for rc3 for windows anyway .. and it makes no sense 
> > > to release windows with i52869 fixed, but other platforms not ... we 
> > > should share the work.
> > 
> > Ok, a Solaris 10 bug has been corrected too, I've no testers on this 
> > platform but it's i52936
> > [...]
> > 
> > > So
> > > 
> > > - platform tests would be done for the english build, using testtool and 
> > > full smoketests.
> > 
> > +1
> > > We would need volunteers to do those tests. Not everybody needs to run 
> > > all the tests we can share the work. I'll try to invite people to 
> > > participate in another mail (but not before sunday), we first should 
> > > "collect" people from other lists (but we have enough volunteers here at 
> > > the list)
> > 
> > great !
> > > 
> > > - to approve a localized build, only a reduced set of the tests need to 
> > > be passed
> > > I'd give this (as usual) to the hands of the native lang teams. But we 
> > > should give a hint, what this "reduced set" would mean. Sophie: do you 
> > > have such reduced test cases at hand? If not, I'll go over the 
> > > smoketests within the next few days.
> > 
> > No, I don't have that kind of test at hand, but I think that we should 
> > keep a part of File Actions tests for localized build for example.
> > > 
> > > Hope, this would help to ease the work and get more active people at the 
> > > same time.
> > 
> > +1 :)
> > 
> > Kind regards
> > Sophie
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.1/64 - Release Date: 04/08/2005
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to