Hi Tora,
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
Hi,
Well, i am not interested in stuff such as a process and would
like to leave it for someone who likes and/or needs to discuss it.
>
> One thing that i would like to mention is that the current L10n
> QA process is well-made, but impedes proliferation of OOo.
I'm cuting your message here, but I really second what you said. For me,
giving a Go to a release has always been a balance between quality and
feedback needs.
Some French contributors don't agree about the fact that I gave a GO to
some releases on plateform that didn't reach the overall quality of the
others.
But... with no release, we got no users - with no users, we got no
testers - with no testers, we got no release. So what ?
I'm sure that we are all aware of the aim of quality we would like or
need to provide, but first we need users that will provide contributors.
It's up to the QA lead to estimate what is the level of quality needed
for its release. The more users, the more quality, but also the more
contributors you may (if you do a good job ;-) have.
Kind regards
Sophie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
