Hello Peter,

Am 21.05.2010 12:20, schrieb Peter Junge:
> Hi Thorsten, Charles, Kendy, *,
> 
> I would like to re-iterate one statement that Charles made, which is
> IMHO the most important point. We have to primarily focus the
> experiences and views of the OOo users, that are not affiliated with the
> OOo community. These users, and I'm sure it's the vast majority, do not
> care how we discriminate different flavors of OOo within the community.
> The global view on OOo is to a large extend influenced by the total
> amount issues over all the distributions. Hence I would like to suggest
> a pragmatic approach to a compromise that might make everyone happy with
> little extra effort, but significantly increasing flow of information.
> 
> Kendy has been suggesting to assign distro specific issues to an
> appropriate alias while Thorsten prefers to see these issues closed,
> which seems reasonable. IMHO both approaches can be combined, by
> flagging such issue indeed as 'Invalid/Closed', but reassigning it to a
> distro-specific alias at the same time. As a result Thorstens statistic
> will be clean, no black hole, while the distro maintainer has a single
> point of access to the issues that might be interesting for him.


FULL ACK


kind regards


Mechtilde


-- 
Dipl. Ing. Mechtilde Stehmann
## http://de.openoffice.org
## Ansprechpartnerin für die deutschsprachige QA
## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris
## Meine Seite http://www.mechtilde.de
## PGP encryption welcome! Key-ID: 0x53B3892B


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to