Le Fri, 21 May 2010 12:55:02 +0200, Mechtilde <o...@mechtilde.de> a écrit :
> Hello Peter, > > > Am 21.05.2010 12:20, schrieb Peter Junge: > > Hi Thorsten, Charles, Kendy, *, > > > > I would like to re-iterate one statement that Charles made, which is > > IMHO the most important point. We have to primarily focus the > > experiences and views of the OOo users, that are not affiliated > > with the OOo community. These users, and I'm sure it's the vast > > majority, do not care how we discriminate different flavors of OOo > > within the community. The global view on OOo is to a large extend > > influenced by the total amount issues over all the distributions. > > Hence I would like to suggest a pragmatic approach to a compromise > > that might make everyone happy with little extra effort, but > > significantly increasing flow of information. > > > > Kendy has been suggesting to assign distro specific issues to an > > appropriate alias while Thorsten prefers to see these issues closed, > > which seems reasonable. IMHO both approaches can be combined, by > > flagging such issue indeed as 'Invalid/Closed', but reassigning it > > to a distro-specific alias at the same time. As a result Thorstens > > statistic will be clean, no black hole, while the distro maintainer > > has a single point of access to the issues that might be > > interesting for him. > > > FULL ACK > > +1 Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qa.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qa.openoffice.org
