[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13061533#comment-13061533
 ] 

Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-3342:
--------------------------------------

Hi Rajith

Im sorry you feel that way, and have to say I disagree in general, but as some 
attempt at explanation:

This is as mentioned above, very much in line with the work Andrew was doing 
previously so its design has as you mention been proposed, and has had the 
previous code available on branches for close to 9 months now. Given this, 
despite this being a reimplementation (involving less change in a more 
controlled fashion), I dont think this is entirely out of the blue and it seems 
like ample discussion had taken place and time to consider it been given.

I can conceed your point about possibly putting it up for review first, 
although I would usually only take course for something that hadnt been given 
prior discussion, hadnt had any review, and had some doubt about it. I would 
stress that this (and Andrews code before it) has already seen *weeks* of 
review from myself before I committed it, and again the previous implemtnation 
has been available for all to look at. Great care was taken to try and ensure 
consistency of the IO behaviour during the restructuring (which was actually 
fairly minimal for the 0-10 code path), and no IO features which were present 
and worked or were being used are being (permanantly) removed. Much of the 
change that went in was nothing to do with the IO layer alongside work, and is 
purely to the Java broker or associated dead Mina related features.

The transports are *not* currently configurable, however as I mentioned above 
they will again be made so via a final JIRA (quite possibly tomorrow), in 
similar fashion to the way they were already. I didn't think this small delay 
was a particular sticking point for the rest of the code given that until these 
changes were made there were no two interface-compatible IO implementations 
available to use such plugability.

> Rationalise transport layer by introducing common interfaces shared by all 
> protocols
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-3342
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3342
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java Broker, Java Client, Java Common
>            Reporter: Keith Wall
>            Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>             Fix For: 0.13
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0002-QPID-3342-rationalise-the-existing-0-10-transport-co.patch, 
> 0003-QPID-3342-transition-TCP-based-Mina-transport-for-0-.patch
>
>
> Refactor the transport stack by introducing two new interfaces 
> NetworkTransport and NetworkConnection.   Remove dependencies between 
> IoSender and IoReceiver.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to