[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15880174#comment-15880174
]
Alex Rudyy commented on QPID-7618:
----------------------------------
Lorenz,
I attached the updated patch bundle containing the new patch addressing the
majority of your review comments.
I have not addressed the following:
{quote}
The changes in Queue.java break backwards compatibility and should be
documented as such for the next release. This also means this should not go
into 6.x. Interesting question: Do we need a versioning scheme for context
variables?
{quote}
I'll add documentation later
I will not added the review comment below which is unrelated to the changes I
made
{quote}
It seems surprising that ServerMessage#isResourceAcceptable always returns true
on 0-8 through 0-10 while on 1.0 it checks for delivery delay. Is that a bug?
{quote}
> Ring policy type
> ----------------
>
> Key: QPID-7618
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7618
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Java Broker
> Affects Versions: qpid-java-6.1.1, qpid-java-7.0
> Reporter: Tomas Vavricka
> Labels: policy-type, queue, ring
> Fix For: qpid-java-7.0
>
> Attachments: 0001-QPID-7569-Ring-policy-type.patch,
> overflow-policy.tar.gz, overflow-policy.tar.gz
>
>
> It would be good if Java Broker will support ring policy.
> Ring policy - delete oldest message(s) when queue capacity is reached
> Queue capacity can be defined by maximum count of message and maximum size of
> messages (including header).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
