On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > On Monday, April 25, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Robby Findler >> <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >>> I just pushed tests for all non-racket and non-scheme collections that >>> makes sure that all of the top-level libraries have their exports >>> fully documented. I left out info.rkt and tried to drop obviously bad >>> things from this list, but if you spot problems when drdr complains at >>> you, please just go edit the file to remove libraries that shouldn't >>> be there. >> >> Thanks, this is useful. >> >> Is there a benefit to have this spread over all the collections, >> instead of in a directory under "collects/tests"? > > I put them where they are to catch the default responsibilities in > drdr. But I have no other reason.
Ah, makes sense. However, this has the drawback that they're in the distribution. Does that need to be fixed? -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
